2009
DOI: 10.1670/07-236r.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ontogenetic Patterns of Agonistic Behavior in a Guild of Larval Ambystomatid Salamanders

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For each larval pair, individuals were placed in separate plastic cylinders, acclimatized for 5 min, and released. For both larvae over the following 30 min, we calculated combined totals of the behaviors: MOVE TOWARD – one salamander moves toward in the direction of another such that continued movement would result in contact; LUNGE – one salamander rapidly and abruptly moves toward another but does not intersect with any part of the other individual's body; BITE – one salamander grabs another with the mouth (definitions from Walls & Jaeger ) and MUTUAL APPROACH – ‘move toward’ performed by both larvae simultaneously (Mott & Sparling ), all of which served as indicators of ‘individual aggression’. For both control (two uninjured larvae) and treatment (one uninjured and one injured larva) conditions, we conducted 25 behavioral trials, and each larva was utilized for a single trial.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For each larval pair, individuals were placed in separate plastic cylinders, acclimatized for 5 min, and released. For both larvae over the following 30 min, we calculated combined totals of the behaviors: MOVE TOWARD – one salamander moves toward in the direction of another such that continued movement would result in contact; LUNGE – one salamander rapidly and abruptly moves toward another but does not intersect with any part of the other individual's body; BITE – one salamander grabs another with the mouth (definitions from Walls & Jaeger ) and MUTUAL APPROACH – ‘move toward’ performed by both larvae simultaneously (Mott & Sparling ), all of which served as indicators of ‘individual aggression’. For both control (two uninjured larvae) and treatment (one uninjured and one injured larva) conditions, we conducted 25 behavioral trials, and each larva was utilized for a single trial.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Competition between conspecifics for habitat and forage resources can drive the frequency and severity of conspecific aggression (Slaney and Northcote, 1974;da Silva Nunes and Jaeger, 1989;Wildy et al, 2001), as can population size-class structure and ontogeny (Brunkow and Collins, 1998;Mott and Sparling, 2009). In addition to intraspecific influences, interspecific interactions, such as prédation or competition for common resources, can also play a role in the pattern of aggressive behaviour among conspecifics (Resetarits Jr., 1991;Beachy, 1994;Brodman, 1996Brodman, ,2004.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%