2007
DOI: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.01012.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ontogenetic switches from plant resistance to tolerance: minimizing costs with age?

Abstract: Changes in herbivory and resource availability during a plant's development should promote ontogenetic shifts in resistance and tolerance, if the costs and benefits of these basic strategies also change as plants develop. We proposed and tested a general model to detect the expression of ontogenetic tradeoffs for these two alternative anti-herbivory strategies in Raphanus sativus. We found that ontogenetic trajectories occur in both resistance and tolerance but in opposite directions. The juvenile stage was mo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
115
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(119 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
3
115
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Resource allocation and spatiotemporal accumulation of defense-related metabolites vary within plant tissues and often reflect the degree and frequency of stresses that plants have to face during their development (Boege and Marquis, 2005;Boege et al, 2007). Therefore, we analyzed NaMYB8-dependent CP accumulation in plant ontogeny, namely at rosette, early elongated, elongated, flowering, and mature stages of the development, using 3-d W+OS-elicited (stressed) and unelicited (control) wild-type plants.…”
Section: Young Systemic Leaves Accumulate High Levels Of Cp After Simmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Resource allocation and spatiotemporal accumulation of defense-related metabolites vary within plant tissues and often reflect the degree and frequency of stresses that plants have to face during their development (Boege and Marquis, 2005;Boege et al, 2007). Therefore, we analyzed NaMYB8-dependent CP accumulation in plant ontogeny, namely at rosette, early elongated, elongated, flowering, and mature stages of the development, using 3-d W+OS-elicited (stressed) and unelicited (control) wild-type plants.…”
Section: Young Systemic Leaves Accumulate High Levels Of Cp After Simmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A value of 0.5 indicates no preference. Significant preferences for damaged (PI \ 0.5) or undamaged (PI [ 0.5) plants are indicated with asterisks: ***P \ 0.001, **P \ 0.01, *P \ 0.05, one-sample t test (n = 17-20) mature trees (Boege et al 2007;Eichhorn et al 2010). Time lags in systemically induced resistance result from complex plant responses based on the detection of damage, production and allocation of signals (e.g.…”
Section: Temporal Aspect Of Induced Resistancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conflicting selection pressures during ontogeny are common and often arise because of trade-offs among traits (23,24). For example, growth rate has clear fitness benefits but also incurs intrinsic and extrinsic costs (23,25).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%