Research on the physiology of birds has grown enormou sly in recent years. Much of thi s g rowth is, of course, a manifestation of the importance of certain domesti cated species in food production, and some of it also reflects the suitability of certain birds as experimental subjects in some types of physiological investigations. How ever, it also is a testimonial to the fact that birds are inherently interesting animals with frequently elaborate behaviors, spectacular powers of locomotion, and impres sive regulatory cap acities. Their evolution from a reptilian stock quite distinct from th at giving rise to their fellow homeotherms, the mammal s, makes consideration of certain of the se regul atory cap acitie s intriguing from a comparative standpoint.Variou s facets of avian phy siology have been extensively tr eated in monographs, symposia, and review articles or chapters over the past fi ve years. The volumes of Avian Biology (64) represent a particularly useful source of information. With this wealth of material available, and considering limitations of sp ace, it seems appropri ate in this article to adopt an eclectic approach. The topics selected for discu ssion should provide a basis for examining the ways in which birds resemble or differ from other vertebrates, especially mammals, in the means by which they meet common functional requirements.
SOME ENERGETIC CONSIDERATIONSMost aspects of avian physiology considered here are directly related to energetics or th e consequence s of catabolic processes, and it is thus pertinent to include a few statements on metabolic rates of birds. These rates tend to vary with a fractional power of body mass, as in most animals. Earlier analyses (29, 95) suggested that the exponent in the allometric equation relating basal metabolic rate (BMR) to body mass was lower than that reported for eutherian mammals (98). Subsequently, this was shown to be an arti fact of lumping data for order s of bird s differing substanti ally in metabolic level (107). When the data are an alyzed properly an exponent near 0.75 is obtained. This is of intere st in view of a recent analy sis of physiological sc aling 1