1988
DOI: 10.1016/s0920-5446(08)70184-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ontogeny of Bradleya normani (Brady): Shape Analysis of Landmarks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…So far, studies have focused either solely on the ostracod outline (e.g., [14, 18, 22, 31, 57]) or on specific features of the valve (e.g., [12, 14, 16, 18, 22, 31, 48, 57]). The geometric morphometric approach applied here enabled the detailed documentation of the patterns of allometric growth in two species of Cytheridella , the discrimination of closely related species, as well as the differentiation of regional morphotypes in one of them.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…So far, studies have focused either solely on the ostracod outline (e.g., [14, 18, 22, 31, 57]) or on specific features of the valve (e.g., [12, 14, 16, 18, 22, 31, 48, 57]). The geometric morphometric approach applied here enabled the detailed documentation of the patterns of allometric growth in two species of Cytheridella , the discrimination of closely related species, as well as the differentiation of regional morphotypes in one of them.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The marine species Tyrrhenocythere amnicola (Sars, 1887) evinces greatest morphological changes between A-6 and A-5 [28]. Bradleya normani (Brady, 1866), in turn, shows greatest change between instars A-4 to A-3 and A-3 to A-2 [48]. Our dataset comprises juveniles only down to A-4; it is, thus, possible that distinct shape changes, which might have occurred earlier during ontogeny, remained unnoticed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Morphometric techniques have experienced a significant progress in recent decades (Bookstein, 1982; Foster & Kaesler, 1988; Rohlf, 1990; Lestrel, 1997a). Some methods, which have been extensively applied to well ornamented ostracods (Kaesler & Foster, 1987; Abe et al , 1988; Reyment et al , 1988; Reyment & Bookstein, 1993; Reyment, 1995), require the identification of diagnostic homologous sites (called ‘landmarks’) on the organism (Bookstein, 1991). For smooth or poorly ornamented ostracods, as with most nonmarine ostracods, outline analysis is used instead (Kaesler & Waters, 1972; Kaesler & Maddocks, 1984; Schweitzer et al , 1986; Burke et al , 1987; Schweitzer & Lohmann, 1990).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They were used for morphological characterization of taxa (Baltanás & Danielopol, ), as well as for description of shape variations, especially those resulting from different environmental factors (Ramos et al, ). Numerous studies on ostracods applied landmark methods with diverse carapace ornaments and pores as landmarks (Elewa, ; Hunt, ; Kaesler & Foster, ; Reyment, ; Reyment & Bookstein, ; Reyment, Bookstein, McKenzie, & Majoran, ). Another, more frequently used, method in geometric morphometrics in ostracodology is the outline approach, utilizing Fourier Analysis or Linhart's B‐spline algorithms (Baltanás & Geiger, ; Van der Meeren, Verschuren, Ito, & Martens, ; Yin, Geiger, & Martens, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%