2000
DOI: 10.1002/1096-8644(200008)112:4<595::aid-ajpa11>3.0.co;2-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ontogeny of histochemical fiber types and muscle function in the masseter muscle of miniature swine

Abstract: In this study of masticatory maturation, the ontogeny of the histochemical fiber type composition of musculus masseter is examined in the omnivorous miniature swine (Sus scrofa). Fiber type characteristics are interpreted by comparison with electromyography (EMG) recorded during feeding behavior. Similar to locomotion studies, the results suggest a correspondence between the composition and arrangement of motor units and their recruitment pattern. Serial sections of masseter muscles from 10 minipigs, ranging f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
0
2

Year Published

2000
2000
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
2
19
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In mammalian masticatory muscles, as in the locomotor muscles, force modulation at low force amplitudes appears to be predominantly via muscle fiber recruitment rather than rate modulation (Goldberg and Derfler, 1977;Hannam and McMillan, 1994;Scutter and Türker, 1998). Mammalian masticatory muscles are not uniform in their fiber types (Anapol and Herring, 2000;Herring, 1994;Maxwell et al, 1979;Wall et al, 2006;Wall et al, 2005), and a large number of studies suggest that smaller, slower motor units are recruited before larger, faster motor units (Clark et al, 1978;Desmedt and Godaux, 1979;Goldberg and Derfler, 1977;LevTov et al, 1993;Lund et al, 1979;Miles and Türker, 1986;Miles et al, 1987;van Eijden and Turkawski, 2001;Van Wessel et al, 2005;Wall et al, 2006;Wall et al, 2005;Yemm, 1977). Thus, the evidence suggests that the generation of progressively higher bite forces during rhythmic mastication is achieved through increased recruitment of larger, faster motor units, resulting in increases in the rate of the generation of muscle force.…”
Section: Rate-modulation Of Bite Forcementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In mammalian masticatory muscles, as in the locomotor muscles, force modulation at low force amplitudes appears to be predominantly via muscle fiber recruitment rather than rate modulation (Goldberg and Derfler, 1977;Hannam and McMillan, 1994;Scutter and Türker, 1998). Mammalian masticatory muscles are not uniform in their fiber types (Anapol and Herring, 2000;Herring, 1994;Maxwell et al, 1979;Wall et al, 2006;Wall et al, 2005), and a large number of studies suggest that smaller, slower motor units are recruited before larger, faster motor units (Clark et al, 1978;Desmedt and Godaux, 1979;Goldberg and Derfler, 1977;LevTov et al, 1993;Lund et al, 1979;Miles and Türker, 1986;Miles et al, 1987;van Eijden and Turkawski, 2001;Van Wessel et al, 2005;Wall et al, 2006;Wall et al, 2005;Yemm, 1977). Thus, the evidence suggests that the generation of progressively higher bite forces during rhythmic mastication is achieved through increased recruitment of larger, faster motor units, resulting in increases in the rate of the generation of muscle force.…”
Section: Rate-modulation Of Bite Forcementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Histochemical staining of skeletal muscle of transgenic and wild-type mice was independently performed by two laboratories, using nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide -nitro-blue tetrazolium (NADH-TR) or succinic dehydrogenase (SDH). Staining with NADH-TR and SDH yield comparable results [22] and are used to differentiate fast, intermediate and slow type myofibres [23,24]. Histochemistry with NADH-TR was performed on the limb muscle (EDL, TA and gastrocnemius) of 3-month old transgenic and wild type mice following described procedures [25].…”
Section: Histochemical Staining and Myofibre Morphometric Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of workers have hypothesized that the differential distribution of fast/type II fibers within chewing muscles, which tend to be concentrated in the superficial parts of muscles such as the masseter and temporalis, is a specialization for the rapid production of high occlusal force during the power stroke of mastication (Anapol and Herring, 2000; Gibbs et al, 1983; Herring, Grimm, and Grimm, 1979; Nielsen and Miller, 1988). The high occlusal force hypothesis is consistent with the suggestion that expression of type IIM (masticatory) MyHC, because of its high force generating ability relative to other fast MyHCs, is often correlated with dietary specializations that require high occlusal forces during prey capture or hard/tough object feeding (Hoh, 2002; Hoh et al, 2006; Yamaguchi, 2007; Reiser et al, 2009; Toniolo et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%