Handbook of Developmental Neurotoxicology 2018
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-809405-1.00017-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ontogeny of Second Messenger Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Gene cluster II showed enrichment for gene regulatory network associated with DNMT1 and DNMT3A, key players of DNA methylation dependent gene repression regulation that is known to mediate expression of synaptic plasticity genes in response to stress (Figure 5 D) (Feng et al, 2010;Moore et al, 2013;Bayraktar and Kreutz, 2018;Sun et al, 2020). We were able to detect activation of REST (miRNA) and DNA methylation dependent gene silencing mechanism which were previously established to be involved in TMT neurotoxicity (Imam et al, 2018;Kim et al, 2021).…”
Section: D Supplementary Table 6)mentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Gene cluster II showed enrichment for gene regulatory network associated with DNMT1 and DNMT3A, key players of DNA methylation dependent gene repression regulation that is known to mediate expression of synaptic plasticity genes in response to stress (Figure 5 D) (Feng et al, 2010;Moore et al, 2013;Bayraktar and Kreutz, 2018;Sun et al, 2020). We were able to detect activation of REST (miRNA) and DNA methylation dependent gene silencing mechanism which were previously established to be involved in TMT neurotoxicity (Imam et al, 2018;Kim et al, 2021).…”
Section: D Supplementary Table 6)mentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Further studies are needed to fully elucidate the composition and evolution of the protein corona of these SPIONs when in contact with the biological milieu. To define safe conditions of SPION exposure avoiding toxic effects, 4,14,16,19,46 cell viability was next assessed at both 14 and 21 DIV (Figure 2A and Figure S7). Viability in all culture conditions was found statistically similar to control cells without nanoparticles, except for the highest concentration of NFA (0.1 mg Fe mL −1 ), in which a significant reduction was identified (oneway ANOVA followed by Scheffétest, p < 0.001*** for all comparisons).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding size, Imam et al found that SPIONs as small as 10 nm generated neuronal damage in SH-SY5Y cells (i.e., a cell line of neuroblastoma origin) after 24 h of exposure at a very low dose (0.01 mg mL −1 ). 14 These data already alerted us to the neurotoxic potential of some very small sized SPIONs and the higher susceptibility of neural cells to SPION-mediated toxicity mechanisms in comparison with other cell types. Considering that nanoparticle size is essential to ensure a desired magnetic performance, a compromise must be taken to maximize therapeutic outcomes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%