2013
DOI: 10.1002/ajhb.22492
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ontogeny of sexual size dimorphism and environmental quality in Guatemalan children

Abstract: A poor quality environment for growth and development, as estimated by SES, was found to reduce or eliminate statistically significant SSD. Patterns of biological maturation before and after puberty also seem to contribute to age changes in SSD.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
7
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…There is much literature on the value of sex differences in morphology as an indicator environmental quality (Bogin, 1999;C amara, 2015;Nikitovic and Bogin, 2014;Stinson, 1985). Human males grow, on average, larger and mature more slowly than females.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There is much literature on the value of sex differences in morphology as an indicator environmental quality (Bogin, 1999;C amara, 2015;Nikitovic and Bogin, 2014;Stinson, 1985). Human males grow, on average, larger and mature more slowly than females.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even as measured heights declined by 10 cm between the years 1500 and 1940, the average difference between the sexes remained about equal. Based on that finding, we hypothesized that variation in the There is much literature on the value of sex differences in morphology as an indicator environmental quality (Stinson, 1985;Bogin, 1999;Nikitovic and Bogin, 2014;Cámara, 2015). Human males grow, on average, larger and mature more slowly than females.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the widespread occurrence of this phenomenon in numerous animal taxa, evidence for this in humans is equivocal (Stinson, 1985). Recent studies on sexual dimorphism in physical stature suggest that male growth is more adversely affected by socioeconomic deprivation (Nikitovic & Bogin, 2013). On the other hand, sexual dimorphism in physical stature remained constant over the course of several centuries in Sweden, despite the dramatic improvement in living conditions during the 20 th Century (Gustafsson, Werdelin, Tullberg, & Lindenfors, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mean stature and body mass were expected to be larger in men than women simply due to genetic and hormonal differences between the sexes [ 87 , 89 , 157 158 ]. Thus, the current study investigated change in a ratio of male to female size that expresses the male mean as a percentage of the female mean for a given variable: (male mean / female mean)*100 [ 159 160 ]. However, this index does not take sample size or standard deviation into account.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%