2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-69904-2_37
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ontological Evolutionary Encoding to Bridge Machine Learning and Conceptual Models: Approach and Industrial Evaluation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1. Encoding: The ontology is used to encode the triplets of a training dataset into feature vectors, as described in [21]. Moreover, since both feature descriptions and model fragments are based on natural language, the terms used in the ontology do not always align well with the terms in the feature description and with the terms in the model fragments.…”
Section: Flim-ml Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1. Encoding: The ontology is used to encode the triplets of a training dataset into feature vectors, as described in [21]. Moreover, since both feature descriptions and model fragments are based on natural language, the terms used in the ontology do not always align well with the terms in the feature description and with the terms in the model fragments.…”
Section: Flim-ml Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [22], we proposed an encoding where each model fragment is encoded as a feature vector taking into account an ontology. Specifically, each concept and relation in the ontology is represented as a feature in the feature vector.…”
Section: Model Fragment Encoding For the Fitness Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, Figure 12 also shows a limitation of the encoding proposed in [22] when it is applied at the model-element level. Several feature vectors contain the same feature values, but different target values (e.g., both pantographs).…”
Section: Legendmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Reengineering firmware into SPLs was possible through feature location. These feature location efforts range from Information Retrieval to Machine Learning, and include the dimension of Search‐based Software Engineering.…”
Section: Application Domainsmentioning
confidence: 99%