2006
DOI: 10.2165/00822942-200605040-00005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ontology Annotation Treebrowser

Abstract: Gene expression and proteomics analysis allow the investigation of thousands of biomolecules in parallel. This results in a long list of interesting genes or proteins and a list of annotation terms in the order of thousands. It is not a trivial task to understand such a gene list and it would require extensive efforts to bring together the overwhelming amounts of associated information from the literature and databases. Thus, it is evident that we need ways of condensing and filtering this information. An exce… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 30 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…PubGene, with co-citations annotated with GO and Medical Subject Heading (MeSH) terms. The work of Masys et al [9] uses shared MeSH terms (as well as hierarchical relationships between such terms) to automatically cluster gene-expression results, while Bressel et al [10] display links between genes (based on MeSH and GO terms) using a tree structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PubGene, with co-citations annotated with GO and Medical Subject Heading (MeSH) terms. The work of Masys et al [9] uses shared MeSH terms (as well as hierarchical relationships between such terms) to automatically cluster gene-expression results, while Bressel et al [10] display links between genes (based on MeSH and GO terms) using a tree structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%