2009
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-10684-2_40
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ontology Based Personalized Modeling for Type 2 Diabetes Risk Analysis: An Integrated Approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…14,15 The main objective of personalized modeling is to create a model for each patient (sample), which is able to reveal the most important information specifically for each sample, focusing attention on the individual patient (sample) rather than simply on the global problem space. 16,17 Previous works have reported that personalized modeling can produce better classification results than those obtained from classical global modeling, 14,16,18 making it more appropriate to build clinical decision support systems for new patients. The framework proposed by Fiasché et al 11,19 used a "personalized" wrapping method, a PMGS described in detail in recent papers 20,21 for gene expression data analysis, integrating new data with the existing models; the block diagram is reported in Figure 1.…”
Section: Personalized Modeling For Identification Of Target Genes In mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14,15 The main objective of personalized modeling is to create a model for each patient (sample), which is able to reveal the most important information specifically for each sample, focusing attention on the individual patient (sample) rather than simply on the global problem space. 16,17 Previous works have reported that personalized modeling can produce better classification results than those obtained from classical global modeling, 14,16,18 making it more appropriate to build clinical decision support systems for new patients. The framework proposed by Fiasché et al 11,19 used a "personalized" wrapping method, a PMGS described in detail in recent papers 20,21 for gene expression data analysis, integrating new data with the existing models; the block diagram is reported in Figure 1.…”
Section: Personalized Modeling For Identification Of Target Genes In mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The noise information in the global problem space should be excluded to obtain a satisfactory result from the analysis. As discussed by Song and Kasabov (2006) and Verma et al (2009), personalized modeling focuses on the individual sample rather than simply on the global problem space, so that creating a personalized problem space specifically for the new data can be a more appropriate solution to analyze new coming data sample in medical area. Personalized modeling is a relative new method in bioinformatics research, which is less found in literature.…”
Section: Gene Selection Methods and Personalized Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ontologies focused on health care are prolific in number and scope, yet are relatively limited in their impact on such a large multifaceted domain. Computer ontologies have been developed and some adopted by medical professionals, with a notable bias in the published research towards provider-centric systems needs (Amoussou, 2011;Beveridge and Fox, 2006;Cenan et al, 2008;Chalortham et al, 2009;Ganendran et al, 2002;Kim and Song, 2007;Kumar and Smith, 2003;Kumar et al, 2004a;Lin and Sakamoto, 2009;Mabotuwana and Warren, 2009;Noy et al, 2009;Bickmore et al, 2011;Rector, 2008;Shahar et al, 2004;Smith et al, 2007) compared with the patientpractitioner relationship environment (Ahmed, 2011;Bailin and Lehmann, 2003;Barrett, 2006;Verma et al, 2009). Context-based task ontologies (CTOs) have been created by Kumar et al to form a core component of a Computer Interpretable Guideline Model intended to automate representation and execution of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) (Kumar et al, 2004b).…”
Section: Itp 292mentioning
confidence: 99%