2016
DOI: 10.6109/jicce.2016.14.2.097
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ontology Mapping and Rule-Based Inference for Learning Resource Integration

Abstract: With the increasing demand for interoperability among existing learning resource systems in order to enable the sharing of learning resources, such resources need to be annotated with ontologies that use different metadata standards. These different ontologies must be reconciled through ontology mediation, so as to cope with information heterogeneity problems, such as semantic and structural conflicts. In this paper, we propose an ontology-mapping technique using Semantic Web Rule Language (SWRL) to generate s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Secondly, for each AADL error, ontology offers the needed concepts to represent error models in terms of states and events, as hardware errors, computational problems and memory exceptions, and thirdly, the ontology offers the connections and subcomponents (constructs) for component implementation. To achieve this task, we use ontology-based representation of component to detect rules custom inference [39]. The system detects three inconsistencies types making certain formal analysis models invalid: error of incomplete or missing transition; conflict transition that may occur when more than one event is triggered simultaneously; and finally, error in the state of a component due to an error in the failure scheduling scenario.…”
Section: Model Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secondly, for each AADL error, ontology offers the needed concepts to represent error models in terms of states and events, as hardware errors, computational problems and memory exceptions, and thirdly, the ontology offers the connections and subcomponents (constructs) for component implementation. To achieve this task, we use ontology-based representation of component to detect rules custom inference [39]. The system detects three inconsistencies types making certain formal analysis models invalid: error of incomplete or missing transition; conflict transition that may occur when more than one event is triggered simultaneously; and finally, error in the state of a component due to an error in the failure scheduling scenario.…”
Section: Model Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%