2021
DOI: 10.1386/eta_00062_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

‘Oohing and ahhing’: The power of thin(g)king in art education research

Abstract: In this article, we seek to explore what new materialist theory and post-intentional phenomenology bring to art education research. Materiality is contextualized politically and historically, and then applied to an emerging research methodology which attempts to centre the material world as a key participant in an art education dissertation research project. The research site, a creative reuse store, serves as both context and participant as the authors explore the powerful collective agency of materiality in … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In line with Smith (in this issue), Hood and Lewis (2021) argue that since many artists are attuned to "the agentic powers of the more-than-human sphere" (p. 224), they can teach others important lessons in perceptual sensitivity to more-than-human agencies and the vitalities of materiality. Art, in this sense, is not that much about human control over materiality, but a zone of contact with the strange, not fully understandable agencies of things (Hood & Lewis, 2021) and becomings. These vital materialities might break through human perceptual grasping, "show us new ways of being" (Hickey & Moody, p. 5), and…”
Section: Artistic Practices Beyond Anthropocentrismmentioning
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In line with Smith (in this issue), Hood and Lewis (2021) argue that since many artists are attuned to "the agentic powers of the more-than-human sphere" (p. 224), they can teach others important lessons in perceptual sensitivity to more-than-human agencies and the vitalities of materiality. Art, in this sense, is not that much about human control over materiality, but a zone of contact with the strange, not fully understandable agencies of things (Hood & Lewis, 2021) and becomings. These vital materialities might break through human perceptual grasping, "show us new ways of being" (Hickey & Moody, p. 5), and…”
Section: Artistic Practices Beyond Anthropocentrismmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…The ontological privileging of the human over matter thus produces isolated selves, and frames artistic, creative practice as the production of isolated art objects, art projects, and art activities (Garoian, 2012). In line with Smith (in this issue), Hood and Lewis (2021) argue that since many artists are attuned to "the agentic powers of the more-than-human sphere" (p. 224), they can teach others important lessons in perceptual sensitivity to more-than-human agencies and the vitalities of materiality. Art, in this sense, is not that much about human control over materiality, but a zone of contact with the strange, not fully understandable agencies of things (Hood & Lewis, 2021) and becomings.…”
Section: Artistic Practices Beyond Anthropocentrismmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Here, an expanded subjectivity that moves beyond my human perception of individual material bodies is imagined, focusing on the human body as part of a larger interdependent material assemblage. This is a radical reorientation, especially within art education's and education's humanistic lineage (Hood, 2018;Hood & Lewis, 2021;Snaza, Sonu, Truman, & Zaliwska, 2016;Snaza & Weaver, 2015).…”
Section: Reflecting On the Co-creative Artmaking Processmentioning
confidence: 99%