2016
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0001135
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

“Oops” Simulation: Cost–Benefits Trade-Off Analysis of Reliable Planning for Construction Activities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In these papers, visualizations are the primary gamification element used, in combination with a simulation or game. Also, Hajifathalian et al (2016) make the example of a game that project managers can play to understand the value of planning because the game is likely to have more issues when it is not properly planned.…”
Section: Solve Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these papers, visualizations are the primary gamification element used, in combination with a simulation or game. Also, Hajifathalian et al (2016) make the example of a game that project managers can play to understand the value of planning because the game is likely to have more issues when it is not properly planned.…”
Section: Solve Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whenever the physical testing or actual application of some project is free of risks and certainty about any expected outcome is granted (quite unbelievable actually), simulation could be disregarded. However, as pointed in [80], planning becomes important as it provides the certainty commonly lacking in new technical developments or complex designs.…”
Section: Economic Benefits Of Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More specifically, Sarigiannidis and Chatzoglou [12] investigated whether project risks are interconnected with people quality and process quality, in software development projects, and Thompson et al [13] introduced the use of Tracy-Widom distribution to represent the duration of project tasks with quite good results. Elbarkouky et al [14] proposed an approach based on fuzzy logic and expert judgments to determine construction project contingency, while Hajifathalian et al [15] used a novel approach and simulations to provide evidence about the value of planning under different construction circumstances. In addition, Qazi et al [16] used simulation to document the functionality of their approach using Expected Utility Theory and Bayesian Belief Networks to formulate a decision problem that captures the interdependency between complexity drivers, risks, and objectives.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%