2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2021.106905
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Opaque auditor dismissal disclosures: What does timing reveal that disclosures do not?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the auditor switching literature is well established and extensive, only a handful of studies have examined the timing of an auditor switch. These studies find that a late auditor switch is associated with longer reporting lags (Schwartz and Soo 1996), lower audit quality (Cassell et al 2020 ;Burks and Stevens 2022) and client firm risk (Her et al 2019). Another approach in the literature is to examine the time between dismissal/resignation of an incumbent auditor and the appointment of the new auditor (i.e., auditor search period).…”
Section: Timing Of Auditor Engagementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the auditor switching literature is well established and extensive, only a handful of studies have examined the timing of an auditor switch. These studies find that a late auditor switch is associated with longer reporting lags (Schwartz and Soo 1996), lower audit quality (Cassell et al 2020 ;Burks and Stevens 2022) and client firm risk (Her et al 2019). Another approach in the literature is to examine the time between dismissal/resignation of an incumbent auditor and the appointment of the new auditor (i.e., auditor search period).…”
Section: Timing Of Auditor Engagementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Catanach et al (2011) found that firms whose auditors resign late in the fiscal year tend to employ non‐Big 4 successor auditors. Burks and Stevens (2022) found that dismissals between the end of the fourth quarter and the SEC 10‐K filing dates are associated with increases in the likelihood of delistings in the future.…”
Section: Literature and Hypotheses Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Advisory Committee on the Auditing Profession (ACAP, 2008) noted that there is a lack of transparency surrounding auditor switches, despite the mandatory disclosure requirements of Forms 8‐K. According to Burks and Stevens (2022), not counting going concern opinions and internal controls deficiencies (also available in other sources such as Forms 10‐K), only 10% of auditor‐switching firms disclose some type of adverse audit information, suggesting that there may be widespread non‐compliance. Even when auditor‐switching firms do in fact disclose in Forms 8‐K, they mostly provide innocuous reasons for the changes, such as a desire for securing a larger or a geographically proximate auditor, or low audit fees or mergers (Sankaraguruswamy & Whisenant, 2004).…”
Section: Literature and Hypotheses Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations