2020
DOI: 10.3390/publications8040049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Open Academic Book Publishing during COVID-19 Pandemic: A View on Romanian University Presses

Abstract: In the context of the 2020 public health crisis that discourages exchanges of physical objects in society, university-led publishing needed to rethink its operations. Worldwide the opening of quality scholarly content proved to be a solution. University presses reacted rapidly and offered books according to the open access model. The present research aimed to map the editorial landscape of Romanian university presses, to identify the main features displayed online by the university presses parented by public u… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 13 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They usually have a general institutional Twitter account rather than a specific account for their publication service. In this regard, a recent study has reported that 91% of 46 Romanian universities presses do not have a social media presence on Facebook, Twitter or LinkedIn (Cernicova-Buca & Luzan, 2020). Martín Becerro (2016), however, found that 76% out of 49 Spanish book publishers specialised in children's and youth literature had a Twitter account.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They usually have a general institutional Twitter account rather than a specific account for their publication service. In this regard, a recent study has reported that 91% of 46 Romanian universities presses do not have a social media presence on Facebook, Twitter or LinkedIn (Cernicova-Buca & Luzan, 2020). Martín Becerro (2016), however, found that 76% out of 49 Spanish book publishers specialised in children's and youth literature had a Twitter account.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%