Open Access

Chibnik, Michael

doi:10.1111/aman.12231

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Other Metrics1

Introduction1

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2015

2021

Publication Types

Select...

Article5

Relationship

Self Cite1

Independent4

Authors

Journals

Cited by 5 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In early September 2015, this article had an Altmetrics score of 491, by far the highest ever recorded for AA . The second highest AA Altmetric score at that time was 63 for my from‐the‐editor column on open access (Chibnik ).…”

Section: Other Metricsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Assessing the Quality of Scholarly Journals

Chibnik

2016

American Anthropologist

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Other Metricsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Assessing the Quality of Scholarly Journals

Chibnik

2016

American Anthropologist

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…4 However, as Brad Weiss notes, 'open access does not mean that publication is free,' 5 and not everyone in the AAA has welcomed or accepted OA as a viable publishing model. Michael Chibnik, editor-in-chief of American Anthropologist after Boellstorff, argued that such a model would require large grants or otherwise would compound the problem of unpaid editorial labour, 6 which remains a problem for a variety of journals. Despite this, positive sentiments about OA remain strong among anthropologists who call for continued exploration in, and experimentation with, OA publishing models that are sustainable and scalable.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Assessing the Openness of Anthropology Journals

Dale¹,

Eichmann-Kalwara²,

Kathuria³

et al. 2017

Journal of Scholarly Publishing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study analyses the extent of gold open access (OA) publishing options in 377 anthropology journals by applying a six-level coding scheme (0 = nontransparent publishing, 5 = fully OA, i.e., free to read and publish without embargo). This analysis is meant to simplify the process of identifying OA journal publishing options in the discipline of anthropology, in addition to sharing findings on some of the prominent issues in OA publishing as they relate to anthropology journals, including non-transparency among publishers and the prevalence and price of article processing charges (APCs). We conclude that publishers should be more transparent about their OA publishing options and policies by providing conspicuous and straightforward information to potential authors. Further, we find that in the anthropology scholarly communication ecosystem, APCs for hybrid journals are more expensive than those for fully gold OA journals, thus contradicting the assumption that gold OA is more costly to researchers.

show abstract

Incomplete regularities

Col

2015

HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Open Access

Cited by 5 publications

References 5 publications

Assessing the Quality of Scholarly Journals

Assessing the Quality of Scholarly Journals

Assessing the Openness of Anthropology Journals

Incomplete regularities

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About