2020
DOI: 10.1002/ajp.23213
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Open‐access platform to synthesize knowledge of ape conservation across sites

Abstract: Despite the large body of literature on ape conservation, much of the data needed for evidence-based conservation decision-making is still not readily accessible and standardized, rendering cross-site comparison difficult. To support knowledge synthesis and to complement the IUCN SSC Ape Populations, Environments and Surveys database, we created the A.P.E.S. Wiki (https://apeswiki.eva.mpg.de), an open-access platform providing site-level information on ape conservation status and context. The aim of this Wiki … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

3
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At the time of analysis, only 3% of pixels included in mining areas had survey data stored in the IUCN SSC A.P.E.S. Database ( 11 ), and only 1% of the total area surveyed and archived in the A.P.E.S. Database overlapped with operational or preoperational mining areas (fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At the time of analysis, only 3% of pixels included in mining areas had survey data stored in the IUCN SSC A.P.E.S. Database ( 11 ), and only 1% of the total area surveyed and archived in the A.P.E.S. Database overlapped with operational or preoperational mining areas (fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, mining currently ranks only fourth in the frequency of reported threats across African ape sites documented in the Ape Populations, Environments and Surveys (A.P.E.S.) Wiki ( 10 ), 65 of 180 sites, i.e., 36% of all sites for which threats have been documented ( 11 ); and is preceded by hunting (89% of sites), logging (62%), and agricultural expansion (62%). However, given recent findings on the density of mining areas across Africa ( 2 ), these values might be a considerable underestimation of the real threat of mining to apes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We consulted the data in the IUCN SSC A.P.E.S. database (hereafter referred to as ‘A.P.E.S.’; ( 11 )) to determine whether survey data existed for sites that overlapped with mining areas and their 10 km buffers. Here, we only included mining areas within the distributional range of great apes (( 5 ), Table 1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, mining currently ranks only forth in the frequency of reported threats across African ape sites documented in the A.P.E.S. Wiki ( 10 ), 65 out of 180 sites, i.e., 36% of all sites for which threats have been documented; ( 11 ) and is preceded by hunting (89% of sites), logging (62%), and agricultural expansion (62%). However, given recent findings on the density of mining areas across Africa ( 2 ), these values might be a considerable underestimation of the real threat of mining to apes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wiki, a recent collaborative effort to create an open-access platform that provides standardized research and conservation data at the study-site level for all ape taxa, with the aim of supporting collaborations across sites and promoting successful conservation decisionmaking (https://apeswiki.eva.mpg.de/index.php). There is already information for numerous chimpanzee study sites in the Wiki, including 59 in West Africa for the critically endangered Pan troglodytes verus at the time of writing this chapter (Heinicke et al, 2021).…”
Section: Large-scale Collaboration In Primatologymentioning
confidence: 99%