2006
DOI: 10.1093/beheco/arl017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Open-cell parasitism shapes maternal investment patterns in the Red Mason bee Osmia rufa

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
69
0
4

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
2
69
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The observed female biased progeny sex ratio and deviations from typical mean body size in our study result from the restricted number of nest tubes leading to an overrepresentation of nests constructed early in the nesting season. Young bees construct more daughter cells and progeny of larger body size (Torchio and Tepedino 1980;Tepedino and Torchio 1982;Tomkins et al 2001;Seidelmann 2006; this study- Table S2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The observed female biased progeny sex ratio and deviations from typical mean body size in our study result from the restricted number of nest tubes leading to an overrepresentation of nests constructed early in the nesting season. Young bees construct more daughter cells and progeny of larger body size (Torchio and Tepedino 1980;Tepedino and Torchio 1982;Tomkins et al 2001;Seidelmann 2006; this study- Table S2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Overwintered cocoons free of parasites were Optimal nest tube size for O. bicornis exposed in the first days of April in the shelter to allow natural emergence. Each year, a total of 800 nest tubes were offered to about 1000 emerging females to correct for a dispersal rate of about 40 % (Seidelmann 2006). After the start of the nesting season, the test box was photographed every 2-3 days to monitor the sealing of the nest tubes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Following the argument of Seidelmann (Seidelmann 2006;Seidelmann et al 2010), this can be explained by shifts of maternal investments toward males due to a higher risk of parasitism caused by reduced tube length. His argument follows the idea that it is less costly to produce males, which are smaller than females, closer to the opening of a tube.…”
Section: Length Of Nesting Tubesmentioning
confidence: 97%