2018
DOI: 10.1109/jstars.2018.2799698
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Open Data for Global Multimodal Land Use Classification: Outcome of the 2017 IEEE GRSS Data Fusion Contest

Abstract: In this paper, we present the scientific outcomes of the 2017 Data Fusion Contest organized by the Image Analysis and Data Fusion Technical Committee of the IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Society. The 2017 Contest was aimed at addressing the problem of local climate zones classification based on a multitemporal and multimodal dataset, including image (Landsat 8 and Sentinel-2) and vector data (from OpenStreetMap). The competition, based on separate geographical locations for the training and testing of the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
91
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
4
91
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our challenge, on the other hand, uses images captured at one timestamp as the input, thus more flexible in real applications. Other previous land cover / land use semantic segmentation challenges as the ISPRS [3] or the IEEE GRSS data fusion contests [22,57] also used single shot ground truths and reported overall and average accuracy scores as evaluation metrics.…”
Section: Land Cover Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our challenge, on the other hand, uses images captured at one timestamp as the input, thus more flexible in real applications. Other previous land cover / land use semantic segmentation challenges as the ISPRS [3] or the IEEE GRSS data fusion contests [22,57] also used single shot ground truths and reported overall and average accuracy scores as evaluation metrics.…”
Section: Land Cover Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following the introduction of LCZs, the World Urban Database and Portal (WUDAPT, http://www.wudapt.org) was initiated [3,4]. WUDAPT has been mainly developed by researchers to obtain high-quality land-cover/land-use information globally, usually via crowdsourcing [5,6], games [7], or other challenges [8]. The WUDAPT project presents a suggested workflow to produce the LCZ map by taking advantage of remote sensing techniques.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To cope with the aforementioned challenge of generalization, the 2017 Geoscience and Remote Sensing Society (GRSS) data fusion contest of the year 2017 proposed training the classifier on five cities (Berlin, Hong Kong, Paris, Rome, and Sao Paulo) and testing the results on four other cities (Amsterdam, Chicago, Madrid, and Xi'an). Although deep learning-based classification methods have proven to be strong in terms of classification accuracy a generalization capability in the remote sensing community [21][22][23][24], the ensemble-based canonical correlation forest (CCF) classification strategy achieved the best performance in the contest, among more than 800 submissions [8,25]. Therefore, this work uses the CCF classifier to pursue a solution for our task.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the OA and kappa of the proposed framework were 76.15% and 0.72, which outperformed the baseline accuracy by 6.01% and 7%, respectively. Furthermore, the OA and kappa of the proposed framework still outperformed the winner of the 2017 IEEE GRSS Data Fusion Contest [17], [31], [37] by 1.21% and 1%, respectively, although fewer classifiers were used in this paper.…”
Section: A Baseline Framework and Feature Importancementioning
confidence: 85%
“…A CCF is an advanced forest classifier that naturally incorporates both the labels and the correlation between the input features in the choice of projection for computing decision boundaries in the projected feature space. Results demonstrate that the CCF has much better performance than other forest classifiers, such as the RF [23] and rotation forest (RoF) [36], when the training and test samples are not from the same domain [37]. Besides CCFs, three more works have managed to approach the intercity transferability problem by developing a co-training process [32], ensembling various classifiers [33], and conducting object-based classification [34] approaches.…”
Section: Global Mappingmentioning
confidence: 99%