Open Defecation and Childhood Stunting in India: An Ecological Analysis of New Data from 112 Districts

Abstract

Poor sanitation remains a major public health concern linked to several important health outcomes; emerging evidence indicates a link to childhood stunting. In India over half of the population defecates in the open; the prevalence of stunting remains very high. Recently published data on levels of stunting in 112 districts of India provide an opportunity to explore the relationship between levels of open defecation and stunting within this population. We conducted an ecological regression analysis to assess the association between the prevalence of open defecation and stunting after adjustment for potential confounding factors. Data from the 2011 HUNGaMA survey was used for the outcome of interest, stunting; data from the 2011 Indian Census for the same districts was used for the exposure of interest, open defecation. After adjustment for various potential confounding factors – including socio-economic status, maternal education and calorie availability – a 10 percent increase in open defecation was associated with a 0.7 percentage point increase in both stunting and severe stunting. Differences in open defecation can statistically account for 35 to 55 percent of the average difference in stunting between districts identified as low-performing and high-performing in the HUNGaMA data. In addition, using a Monte Carlo simulation, we explored the effect on statistical power of the common practice of dichotomizing continuous height data into binary stunting indicators. Our simulation showed that dichotomization of height sacrifices statistical power, suggesting that our estimate of the association between open defecation and stunting may be a lower bound. Whilst our analysis is ecological and therefore vulnerable to residual confounding, these findings use the most recently collected large-scale data from India to add to a growing body of suggestive evidence for an effect of poor sanitation on human growth. New intervention studies, currently underway, may shed more light on this important issue.

Toilets Can Work: Short and Medium Run Health Impacts of Addressing Complementarities and Externalities in Water and Sanitation

“…A complete costbenefit assessment would require monetizing all of the program's benefits, for which data are not available. These other benefits may include reductions in the incidence of other morbidities such as stunting or soil-transmitted helminth infections (Spears, Ghosh, andCumming 2013, Strunz et al 2014), decreases in time spent collecting water (Pattanayak et al 2010, Kremer et al 2011, Devoto et al 2012, and the amenity value of private toilets.…”

Zinc-enriched fertilisers as a potential public health intervention in Africa

“…Although deficiency estimates in the current study, which are based on dietary intakes of Zn and PA, show a general positive relationship with the WHO estimates of childhood stunting prevalence, the relationship is not statistically significant (P>0.1) for both the absolute and log-transformed values. Other potential underlying causes of stunting include caloric deficiency (Stein et al 2003), mother's body mass index (Mamiro et al 2005) access to clean drinking water (Esrey et al 1988) and sanitation and hygiene practices (Fink et al 2011;Spears et al 2013). …”

Place and Child Health: The Interaction of Population Density and Sanitation in Developing Countries

“…With a sample less than 4 % as large as in the international analysis presented earlier, we are unable to precisely identify effects on infant mortality, a low probability binary outcome, using district fixed effects. Sample size is less of a constraint for continuously distributed, normalized height-for-age, which is routinely studied in samples of this size (e.g., Spears et al 2013). Online Resource 1 presents evidence that supports an interactive effect of sanitation and population density on infant mortality.…”