2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00265-021-02999-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Open habitats promote female group formation in a solitary ungulate: the Japanese serow

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…grasses) favour the onset of large social groups (Jarman 1974). This process has been observed in Pyrenean chamois Rupicapra pyrenaica pyrenaica (Herrero et al 2002) and, more recently, in the Japanese serow, where open habitats promote spatial group formation (Takada & Minami 2021). In turn, the patchy distribution of serow females should favour the monopolisation of mating opportunities and the transition between monogamy and polygyny (Kishimoto 2003, Takada et al 2023).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…grasses) favour the onset of large social groups (Jarman 1974). This process has been observed in Pyrenean chamois Rupicapra pyrenaica pyrenaica (Herrero et al 2002) and, more recently, in the Japanese serow, where open habitats promote spatial group formation (Takada & Minami 2021). In turn, the patchy distribution of serow females should favour the monopolisation of mating opportunities and the transition between monogamy and polygyny (Kishimoto 2003, Takada et al 2023).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…grasses) favour the onset of large social groups (Jarman 1974). This process has been observed in Pyrenean chamois Rupicapra pyrenaica pyrenaica (Herrero et al 2002) and, more recently, in the Japanese serow, where open habitats promote spatial group formation (Takada & Minami 2021).…”
Section: The Ecology Of Mate Monopolisationmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Although deer and serows were observed in both areas in other surveys using ground observation including biological footprints and camera traps (Shin‐etsu Nature Conservation Office, Ministry of the Environment, 2022; Takada et al, 2021), the different observed locations of the deer and serows would reflect the behavioral and ecological differences between the two species. Japanese serows are solitary and territorial (Kishimoto & Kawamich, 1996; Takada & Minami, 2019, 2021) and select steeper slopes than sika deer (Seki & Hayama, 2021; Takada et al, 2020), whereas deer form large groups, and their high densities affect the vegetation in their habitat (Takatsuki, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Social interactions can be influenced by environmental factors such as food abundance and potential predation risk (Beauchamp, 2004;Schaerf et al, 2017), but also by many aspects of the abiotic environment, including light levels (Ginnaw et al, 2020), temperature (Bartolini et al, 2015), hypoxia (Domenici et al, 2017), turbidity (Chamberlain and Ioannou, 2019), and habitat structure (Takada and Minami, 2021), as well as by anthropogenic changes such as acoustic noise (Currie et al, 2020), and pollutants (Armstrong et al, 2011). While environmental factors can impact behavior through the masking of cues and signals (McNett et al, 2010) and shifting attention to other tasks (Chan et al, 2010), environmental conditions can also affect behavior via physiological changes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%