Open innovation and performance in the service sector

Abstract

Purpose Organizations that decide to invest in innovation must define how this will be done: internally, externally or in a hybrid way, developing internal research and establishing partnerships with other agents of the innovation system. This paper aims to analyze whether the service companies’ intensity of openness and innovation efforts are related to their innovative and financial performances. Open innovation assumes that organizations should use external and internal resources as they develop new technologies. Design/methodology/approach The study used data from the survey of technological innovation (Pintec). As regards innovations, it was considered the commercial and operational innovation performances and the innovative novelty performance. As regards financial performance, it was considered the overall net sales per employee. The intensity of open innovation was measured by the combination of breadth and depth (diversity and importance of the interfaces). The innovative effort was measured by spending on innovation activities. Regressions were applied to evaluate a set of hypotheses. Findings The results indicate that companies with a greater orientation toward open innovation presented better scores. The results also lead to the conclusion that foreign firm ownership structure and being part of a corporate group were the factors that caused the greatest impact on financial performance in the service sector. Practical implications The study provides empirical data on the importance of open innovation in improving organizations' performance, especially the breadth of open innovation. Originality/value The study contributes to expanding the research field addressing the relationship between service innovation and performance.

Open Innovation—An Explorative Study on Value Co-Creation Tools for Nation Branding and Building a Competitive Identity

“…From the authors' perspective, it has the potential to speed up the innovation process of a nation by taking advantage of the information and shared knowledge of external stakeholders (the outside-in approach to open innovation) and thus will have a supportive role to reach a superior positioning of a nation in regards to a scientific nation branding perspective. Corresponding to various scholars' thinking [42,44,[80][81][82], the authors regard cross-sectoral information flows between different stakeholders as mutually beneficial opportunity to co-create value which is in line with sub-concepts of open innovation. The authors argue that through an application of the outside-in approach of the scientific concept of open innovation, the co-creation of additional knowledge will take place which will result in mutually beneficial value (value innovation) and thus supports the exploration of superior branding opportunities for a nation.…”

Strategic Approach to Configurational Analysis of Entrepreneurial Orientation, Strategic Networking, and SME Performance within Emerging Markets of Selected Southeast European Countries

“…All of these factors have been empirically confirmed to significantly contribute to strategic network performance (Milovanović et al 2020;Schoonjans et al 2013;Konsti-Laakso et al 2012;Lee et al 2010;Stanko et al 2007;Chang and Harwood 2001). Furthermore, digital technologies provide a wide range of innovation opportunities in the modalities of entrepreneurial activities and emphasize openness, interaction, and networking as key determinants of contemporary entrepreneurial activities, such as the open innovation paradigm (De Vincenzi and Cunha 2021;Chesbrough 2003) and the concept of co-creation (Takahashi and Takahashi 2021;Ramaswamy and Ozcan 2018).…”

“…The essential dimension that characterizes a firm's entrepreneurial orientation is innovativeness. Innovativeness refers to a firm s propensity to create and exploit new products, markets, technologies, or business models through the process of learning and experimentation, which may result in better market position and significantly improved business performance (De Vincenzi and Cunha 2021;Ngoc Mai et al 2019;Saunila et al 2014;Leiponen 2000). Closely related to innovation is the dimension of proactiveness.…”

Open Innovation Strategy in Goods Manufacturing and Service Industries

“…Firm Performance. Organizations that establish OI processes generate superior outcomes; they also show that a higher degree of originality in inventions has a good influence on service companies' financial success (Vincenzi & Cunha, 2021). As service organizations broaden their internal knowledge base to allow for the influx of ideas from external sources and external partnerships, they broaden their pool of innovation prospects, resulting in improved innovation performance.…”