2017
DOI: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000004229
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Open-label trial of ranolazine for the treatment of myotonia congenita

Abstract: This study provides Class IV evidence that ranolazine improves myotonia in myotonia congenita.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
25
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Dosage was 500 mg twice a day and was further increased to 1000 mg twice a day. Larger studies are needed to confirm the benefits of treatment [66].…”
Section: Therapeutic Options In Ndmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dosage was 500 mg twice a day and was further increased to 1000 mg twice a day. Larger studies are needed to confirm the benefits of treatment [66].…”
Section: Therapeutic Options In Ndmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the drug does have proarrhythmic potential, and use is contraindicated in second-or third-degree AV block which may increase risk in some patients with DM. Lamotrigine, another sodium channel blocker, has been shown to be effective in nondystrophic myotonia, and ranolazine, which increases slow inactivation of sodium channels, may be effective for the treatment of myotonic dystrophy as well as nondystrophic forms of myotonia such as paramyotonia congenita and myotonia congenita [28][29][30][31][32].…”
Section: Skeletal Musclementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study used a stopwatch to measure the duration of myotonia . In 2017, the authors of an open‐label trial with ranolazine similarly chose stopwatch and subjective grading of stiffness severity by participants . The computerized approach requires special equipment that is not available in most centers, possibly explaining the choice of subjective questionnaires and less accurate measurement using stopwatches by other authors.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 In 2017, the authors of an open-label trial with ranolazine similarly chose stopwatch and subjective grading of stiffness severity by participants. 8 The computerized approach 3 requires special equipment that is not available in most centers, possibly explaining the choice of subjective questionnaires and less accurate measurement using stopwatches by other authors.We sought to develop a simple method of quantitating myotonia using a commercially available dynamometer and to prove it suitable as an outcome measure in clinical trials and as part of routine examinations. Our objectives were to assess the reliability of the method, strength of correlation between RT and MBS, and differences of both RT and MBS between patients with DM1 and DM2.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%