Open Media Science

Martiny, Kristian Møller Moltke; Pedersen, David Budtz; Birkegaard, Alfred

doi:10.22323/2.15060202

Cited by 6 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 33 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…A number of challenges must be taken into account when open data is used in community-driven research, such as challenges related to data quality, bias in data and transparency in tools (Allan and Redden 2017;Martiny, Budtz Pedersen and Birkegaard 2016). One example can be found in research using game elements and involving participants who contribute to the development of knowledge and solutions, also known as scientific discovery games (Good and Su 2011;Cooper 2015).…”

Section: Opening the Research Communitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Educating for co‑Production of Community‑Driven Knowledge

Magnussen¹,

Hamann²,

Stensgaard³

2019

EJEL

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

T -toincorporates factors in cultural protocols and game design thinking. The hybrid model of the participatory co-creation model was formulated in the study that had been rolled out in two rural primary schools in West Borneo. These schools are located in remote villages, away from urban amenities, and technological affordances and resources are limited. There are more than twenty culturally-diversed indigenous tribes in Borneo. Although it is a known fact that indigenous cultures, including those in Borneo, have many cultural protocols and distinctive custom practices, it is still a challenge for researchers who work with such communities to understand, adhere to and follow the cultural protocols. The model looks at incorporating gameplay and culture protocols to drive community engagement. Since play is universal, the creation of a trustworthy partnership between the community and researchers was established through the use of play during the engagement process. Narratives captured in the study represented reflection, problem solving and creativity in the interactions with the indigenous communities, based on the developed -to-.

show abstract

Section: Opening the Research Communitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Educating for co‑Production of Community‑Driven Knowledge

Magnussen¹,

Hamann²,

Stensgaard³

2019

EJEL

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…These contributions contribute to an ongoing interest within the JCOM community to learn more about the experiences of scientists communicating science in developing countries, or using new and emerging approaches (such as blogging and social media). Martiny, Pedersen and Birkegaard [2016] tackle this by looking at the challenges inherent in the open science movement, also in this issue of JCOM. Martiny, Pedersen and Birkegaard [2016] argue that there are three challenges that researchers using an open science model face: communication, collaboration and culture.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Martiny, Pedersen and Birkegaard [2016] tackle this by looking at the challenges inherent in the open science movement, also in this issue of JCOM. Martiny, Pedersen and Birkegaard [2016] argue that there are three challenges that researchers using an open science model face: communication, collaboration and culture. The communication challenge is one of recognition; scientists are generally recognised for their contributions to peer-reviewed academic journals, but these are not generally available to the public, nor written to be accessible to a broad audience.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…They ask: If the public communication that could be embedded in an open science programme is not rewarded, what is the motivation to undertake it? From a collaboration perspective, Martiny, Pedersen and Birkegaard [2016] suggest that open science means learning new ways of collaborating and the use of new tools (e.g. online tools) that scientists are not trained to use (and incidentally are constantly changing).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…They highlight a number of benefits, but also point to challenges for scientist. For example, as regards collaboration in open science projects, Martiny, Pedersen and Birkegaard [2016] suggest that 'collaborative skills need to be added to the repertoire of scientific skills so as to avoid 'openwashing' the knowledge process.' (p. 11) They also note that their approach requires a shift in the way we think about data, with scientists needing to become familiar with first person (rather than 'objective') data, a perspective that would be familiar to many science and technology studies scholars.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Filling the Gaps: exploring researchers communication experiences

Weitkamp¹

2016

JCOM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This issue sees the publication of several papers that contribute to our understanding of the challenges faced by researchers in communicating about their research, adding richness to our understanding of practices and policies in Zimbabwe as well as amongst non-Anglophone speakers working in Australia. The potential of incorporating documentary filmmaking tools and techniques into open science projects raises interesting questions about subjectivity, data and the collaboration skills needed for today's scientists.

show abstract

Open Science and the Science-Society Relationship

Lakomý

Hlavová

Macháčková

2019

Soc

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Nowadays, the prevailing trend in the science-society relationship is to engage with the broader public, which is beneficial for the public, scientific institutes, scientific findings, and the legitimacy of science as a whole. This article provides a broad review of the rapidly growing research on Open Science and identifies the gaps in the current knowledge for future research. The review focuses on the science-society relationship, such that knowledge from this field is summarised and systematised. Insight into the most salient topics, including science communication, public engagement with science, public cognition of science, and challenges and potential unintended consequences connected to interactions with the public are examined. The first section of the paper focuses on science communication which involves efforts and approaches to inform the public about science by the most effective means. The section on public engagement reviews how scientists and scientific institutions are increasingly involved in direct interactions with the public and different groups of stakeholders to make science more open. The section focusing on public cognition of science provides information about public knowledge, perception, and trust regarding science, which both determines and is formed by public engagement. Last, risks, ethical issues, and data issues connected to the implementation of Open Science principles are reviewed, as there are many unintended consequences of Open Science which are examined by this current research. In conclusion, research covering the science-society relationship is rapidly growing. However, it brings multiple challenges as well as opportunities which are captured and discussed in a variety of existing studies. This article provides a coherent overview of this field in order to bring more comprehensible knowledge to scientists, scientific institutions, and outreach professionals.

show abstract

Open Media Science

Abstract: In this article, we present three challenges to the emerging Open Science (OS)

Cited by 6 publications

References 33 publications

Educating for co‑Production of Community‑Driven Knowledge

Educating for co‑Production of Community‑Driven Knowledge

Filling the Gaps: exploring researchers communication experiences

Open Science and the Science-Society Relationship

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About