2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.disc.2013.01.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Open packing, total domination, and theP3-Radon number

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For all graphs G, r o (G) ≤ g t (G), where g t (G) denotes the total domination number [33]. Rall proved that r o (T) = g t (T) for all trees with at least two vertices [49].…”
Section: Theorem 24 [51] If G Is a Tree Or G Contains A Perfect Codementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For all graphs G, r o (G) ≤ g t (G), where g t (G) denotes the total domination number [33]. Rall proved that r o (T) = g t (T) for all trees with at least two vertices [49].…”
Section: Theorem 24 [51] If G Is a Tree Or G Contains A Perfect Codementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Graph dominations are widely applied in different problems such as dominating queens, computer network, school bus routing, and social network problems. Specifically, graph dominations have huge applications in chemistry [1][2][3][4][5]. Chemical structures can be represented by graphs, where vertices and edges represent atoms and chemical bonds, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of such a correspondence, many chemical and physical properties of molecules are in correlation with graph theoretical invariants. One very important such invariant is the total (double) domination number [2,[6][7][8][9][10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Open packing is the natural dual object of total dominating sets, and so ρ 0 (G) ≤ γ t (G) holds for every graph G, [5]. Moreover, if there exists a total dominating set D of G and D is also an open packing, then ρ 0 (G) = γ t (G) = |D|.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For computing γ t (G), it is enough to calculate |T |.|T | = 2|{v 1,3 , v 1,4 , v 2,1 , v 2,2 , v 2,7 , v 2,8 , v 2,9 , v 3,1 , v 3,2 , v 3,7 , v3,8 , v 3,13 , v 3,14 , v 4,2 , v 4,5 , v 4,6 , v 4,11 , v 4,12 , v 4,15 , v 5,2 , v 5,3 , v 5,8 , v 5,9 , v 5,14 , v 5,15 , v 6,4 }|.Then|T | ≤ |V (G[n])| 6n − 2 = 14n 2 − 2n. Since ρ 0 (G) ≤ γ t (G) holds for every graph G[5]. So that the inequality is hold.…”
unclassified