Open Peer Commentary and Author's Response

Zhao, Kun; Lawn, Erin C. R.; Bainbridge, Timothy F.

doi:10.1002/per.2284

Cited by 12 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 369 publications

(845 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Measurement invariance analyses are a useful tool, but they have been criticized as too sensitive, potentially detecting minor violations of invariance that can be safely ignored (Funder, 2020). The analyses are conditional on a factor model that may be useful but is almost certainly incorrect (Srivastava, 2020;Wood et al, 2015). We attempted to address the former issue by gauging the practical differences between a priori and corrected measures, but the psychometric properties of Big Five measures should never be considered settled for all populations and applications.…”

Section: Limitations and Conclusionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Big Five Across Socioeconomic Status: Measurement Invariance, Relationships, and Age Trends

Hughes

Costello

Pearman

et al. 2021

Collabra: Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Associations between socioeconomic status (SES) and personality traits have important implications for theory and application. Progress in understanding these associations depends on valid measurement, unbiased estimation, and careful assessment of generalizability. In this registered report, we used data from AIID, a large online study, to address three basic questions about personality and SES. First, we evaluated the measurement invariance of a common measure of personality, the Big Five Inventory, across indicators of educational attainment, income, and occupational prestige. Fit indices showed some instances of detectable noninvariance, but with little practical impact on substantive results. Second, we estimated associations between SES and personality. Results showed that personality and SES were largely independent (most rs < .1), in contrast to predictions derived from several previous studies. Third, we tested whether age trends in personality were moderated by SES. Results did not support predictions from social investment theory, but they did suggest that age trends were largely generalizable across SES. We discuss the implications of these findings for developing and validating personality measures for use in diverse samples. We also discuss the implications for theories that propose that the Big Five are responsive to, or partially responsible for, people’s economic and social conditions.

show abstract

Section: Limitations and Conclusionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Big Five Across Socioeconomic Status: Measurement Invariance, Relationships, and Age Trends

Hughes

Costello

Pearman

et al. 2021

Collabra: Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Evaluating an Abbreviated Version of the Circumplex Team Scan Inventory of Within-Team Interpersonal Norms

Locke

Martin

2024

European Journal of Psychological Assessment

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract. The Circumplex Team Scan (CTS) assesses the degree to which a team’s interaction/communication norms reflect each segment (16th) of the interpersonal circle/circumplex. We developed and evaluated an abbreviated 16-item CTS-16 that uses one CTS item to measure each segment. Undergraduates ( n = 446) completing engineering course projects in 139 teams completed the CTS-16. CTS-16 items showed a good fit to confirmatory structural models (e.g., that expect greater positive covariation between items theoretically closer to the circumplex). Individuals’ ratings sufficiently reflected team-level norms to justify averaging team members’ ratings. However, individual items’ marginal reliabilities suggest using the CTS-16 to assess general circumplex-wide patterns rather than specific segments. CTS-16 ratings correlated with respondents’ and their teammates’ ratings of team climate (inclusion, justice, psychological safety). Teams with more extraverted (introverted) members were perceived as having more confident/engaged (timid/hesitant) cultures. Members predisposed to social alienation perceived their team’s culture as relatively disrespectful/unengaged, but their teammates did not corroborate those perceptions. The results overall support the validity and utility of the CTS-16 and of an interpersonal circumplex model of team culture more generally.

show abstract

A Short Measure of the Big Five Aspects: Development and Validation of the BFAS-40

Gallagher

Stevenor

Samo

et al. 2022

Journal of Personality Assessment

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Open Peer Commentary and Author's Response

Cited by 12 publications

References 369 publications

The Big Five Across Socioeconomic Status: Measurement Invariance, Relationships, and Age Trends

The Big Five Across Socioeconomic Status: Measurement Invariance, Relationships, and Age Trends

Evaluating an Abbreviated Version of the Circumplex Team Scan Inventory of Within-Team Interpersonal Norms

A Short Measure of the Big Five Aspects: Development and Validation of the BFAS-40

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About