1980
DOI: 10.1080/03004278085200111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Open plan primary schools: findings and implications of a national inquiry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Brogden, 2007), some of which have been directly linked to innovative designs. One such attempt was the open-plan movement in the 1970s (Bennett et al, 1980), which was described by contemporary commentators as representing innovation without change (e.g. Adelman and Walker, 1974).…”
Section: The Role Of Design In the Bsf Programmementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Brogden, 2007), some of which have been directly linked to innovative designs. One such attempt was the open-plan movement in the 1970s (Bennett et al, 1980), which was described by contemporary commentators as representing innovation without change (e.g. Adelman and Walker, 1974).…”
Section: The Role Of Design In the Bsf Programmementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Priestley et al, 2011). Similarly, a relationship has been found between style of physical environment and teaching practice (Horne-Martin, 1999, 2002; Sigurðardóttir & Hjartarson, 2011), but identical spaces can be used in different ways in different schools (Bennett, Andreae, Hegarty, & Wade, 1980, p. 217) and it is clear that the ethos of the school affects the way space is engaged with, organised and used (Uline, Tschannen-Moran, & DeVere Wolsey, 2009). Conversely, ‘the physical environment is a visible sign of the school’s culture: tangible evidence of its values, norms and behaviours’ (Briggs, 2001, p. 176).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…These models can potentially explain some historic examples of occasions when alterations were made to physical learning space but change in educational practices failed to happen: it can be proposed that developing new practices will tend to require changes that may include, but should not be limited to, changing the physical space (Bennett et al, 1980; Cooper, 1981). Such models may also be useful in thinking about altering pedagogical practices to include more team teaching, for example, a change often proposed in connection with more flexible use of space, which has been shown to be difficult to enact (Graue, Hatch, Rao, & Oen, 2007; York-Barr, Ghere, & Sommerness, 2007): in this case, the change made is organisational, but what is desired is change in teaching and learning and, arguably, a change in culture.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This 'progressive' classroom style was popular during the educational reform of the 1960s and 1970s where traditional didactic teaching was replaced by a more 'child-centered' approach [12]; see also [53]. Additionally, building open plan spaces complemented post-war economic restraints [10]. However, because of noise and visual distraction, it was not long before the open spaces were converted back to enclosed classrooms [53].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%