1991
DOI: 10.1007/bf01184983
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Open pore description of mechanical properties of ceramics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
90
0
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 131 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
6
90
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…(32), is a variable calculated from a microscopic model of a frame moving in a fluid and is here taken as ¼. Furthermore, the porosity dependency of the skeletal frame moduli (Young's modulus, , bulk modulus, , and rigidity modulus, ) can be expressed in terms of material volume fraction, ( ), and Young's modulus of the solid material of the frame, , as (Wagh et al 1991) (33-1)…”
Section: Numerical Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(32), is a variable calculated from a microscopic model of a frame moving in a fluid and is here taken as ¼. Furthermore, the porosity dependency of the skeletal frame moduli (Young's modulus, , bulk modulus, , and rigidity modulus, ) can be expressed in terms of material volume fraction, ( ), and Young's modulus of the solid material of the frame, , as (Wagh et al 1991) (33-1)…”
Section: Numerical Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18,19 The increasing tortuosity is caused by pore coarsening. [20][21][22][23] Coarsening causes higher standard deviation in tortuosity caused by the variance in the pore size distribution.…”
Section: Electrochemical and Solid-state Letters 10 ͑12͒ B214-b217 ͑mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, as an example we will use a conservative value (f = 1.20). Finally, as noted by Wagh et al [65] fittings of experimental data for different materials often give pc = 1 and this is the value we adopt for this example.…”
Section: Micromachines 2015 6 1373mentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Here, as an example we will use a conservative value (f = 1.20). Finally, as noted by Wagh et al [65] fittings of experimental data for different materials often give p c = 1 and this is the value we adopt for this example. Indeed, as indicated in Table 1, the values found for the different cases of porosity validate the above discussion of the decreased elastic modulus of the laser-affected zones.…”
Section: Micromachines 2015 6 1373mentioning
confidence: 89%