2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2014.11.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Open Power Morcellation Versus Contained Power Morcellation Within an Insufflated Isolation Bag: Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
48
2
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
48
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, application of a bag system consumes time, which was reported to prolong surgery by 20-30 min as compared to retrospective controls with uncontained morcellation [14,19,20]. In the present study, median total time associated with the bag use was only 10 min, confirming the positive experience from our pilot work [16].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Nevertheless, application of a bag system consumes time, which was reported to prolong surgery by 20-30 min as compared to retrospective controls with uncontained morcellation [14,19,20]. In the present study, median total time associated with the bag use was only 10 min, confirming the positive experience from our pilot work [16].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…In literature, several authors have recommended in-bag power morcellation as an alternative to uncontained morcellation of myomas [15][16][17] . However, this technique requires bag insufflation, which can be time-consuming and technically challenging for less experienced surgeons.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…d and e Cell density and Ki-67 index were decreased in AI group. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 and to inspect all the surgical fields during laparoscopy with caution [58,59]. Until now, no effective method to prevent tissue dispersion from power morcellation has been established [60][61][62].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%