Open Practices Badges for Curricula Vitae: An additional way to help change incentives in Psychological Science?

Aarts, Alexander A.

doi:10.31234/osf.io/n5rdv

Cited by 3 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 17 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…For example, open access publications, open data, code, and materials, preprints (Sarabipour et al, 2019), and registered reports are associated with increased citation rates (Hobson, 2019; Piwowar & Vision, 2013; Pontika, 2015; Sarabipour et al, 2019) and allow more timely sharing of academic work. Many of these tools are considered scientific outputs with their own digital object identifiers, which can help ECRs establish their scholarly reputation, improve academic curriculum vitas, and increase employability (Aarts, 2017; Markowetz, 2015; O’Carroll et al, 2017). While these practical benefits may not be uniquely relevant to feminist ECRs (see Toribio-Flórez et al, 2021), they are particularly useful for ECRs stemming from this perspective given how feminist psychology involves the reclaiming of agency and power in mainstream spaces.…”

Section: Navigating Open Science As Early Career Feminist Researchersmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This can make a vital difference for feminist ECRs, particularly for those from traditionally marginalized and under-represented groups in academia, by ensuring that the work involved in this research is highlighted and appropriately credited. In essence, open science may allow feminist ECRs to further the reach and accessibility of their research, which can have practical benefits for ECRs as they grapple with establishing a scholarly reputation (e.g., Aarts, 2017; Markowetz, 2015; O’Carroll et al, 2017).…”

Section: Navigating Open Science As Early Career Feminist Researchersmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Navigating Open Science as Early Career Feminist Researchers

Pownall

Talbot

Henschel

et al. 2021

Psychology of Women Quarterly

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Open science aims to improve the rigor, robustness, and reproducibility of psychological research. Despite resistance from some academics, the open science movement has been championed by some early career researchers (ECRs), who have proposed innovative new tools and methods to promote and employ open research principles. Feminist ECRs have much to contribute to this emerging way of doing research. However, they face unique barriers, which may prohibit their full engagement with the open science movement. We, 10 feminist ECRs in psychology from a diverse range of academic and personal backgrounds, explore open science through a feminist lens to consider how voice and power may be negotiated in unique ways for ECRs. Taking a critical and intersectional approach, we discuss how feminist early career research may be complemented or challenged by shifts towards open science. We also propose how ECRs can act as grass-roots changemakers within the context of academic precarity. We identify ways in which open science can benefit from feminist epistemology and end with envisaging a future for feminist ECRs who wish to engage with open science practices in their own research.

show abstract

Section: Navigating Open Science As Early Career Feminist Researchersmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Navigating Open Science As Early Career Feminist Researchersmentioning

confidence: 99%

Navigating Open Science as Early Career Feminist Researchers

Pownall

Talbot

Henschel

et al. 2021

Psychology of Women Quarterly

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Given these ongoing challenges, Open Science tools offer practical benefits for ECRs; for example, open access publications , open data, code, and materials), preprints (Sarabipour et al, 2019), and registered reports are associated with increased citation rates (Hobson, 2019;Piwowar & Vision, 2013;Pontika, 2015;Sarabipour et al, 2019). Many of these tools are considered scientific outputs with their own Digital Object Identifiers, which can help ECRs to establish their scholarly reputation, improve academic curriculum vitaes, and increase employability (Aarts, 2017;Markowetz, 2015;O'Carroll et al, 2017).…”

Section: Benefits Of Open Science For Feminist Ecrsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Navigating Open Science as Early Career Feminist Researchers

Pownall¹,

Talbot²,

Henschel³

et al. 2020

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Open Science aims to improve the rigour, robustness, and reproducibility of psychological research. Despite resistance from some academics, the Open Science movement has been championed by some Early Career Researchers (ECRs), who have proposed innovative new tools and methods to promote and employ open research principles. Feminist ECRs have much to contribute to this emerging way of doing research. However, they face unique barriers, which may prohibit their full engagement with the Open Science movement. We, ten feminist ECRs in psychology, from a diverse range of academic and personal backgrounds, explore Open Science through a feminist lens, to consider how voice and power may be negotiated in unique ways for ECRs. Taking a critical and intersectional approach, we discuss how feminist early career research may be complemented or challenged by shifts towards Open Science. We also propose how ECRs can act as grassroots changemakers within the context of academic precarity. We identify ways in which Open Science can benefit from feminist epistemology and end with six practical recommendations for feminist ECRs who wish to engage with Open Science practices in their own research.

show abstract

Open Access, Scholarly Communication, and Open Science in Psychology: An Overview for Researchers

Mullen

2024

Sage Open

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Scholarly communication, Open Access (OA), and open science practices in Psychology are rapidly evolving. However, most published works that focus on scholarly communication issues do not target the specific discipline, and instead take a more “one size fits all” approach. When it comes to scholarly communication, research practices and traditions vary greatly across and within disciplines. This monograph presents a current overview that aims to cover Open Access (OA) and some of the newer open science-related issues that are affecting Psychology. Issues covered include topics around OA of all types, as well as other important scholarly communication-related issues such as the emergence of preprint options, the evolution of new peer review models, citation metrics, persistent identifiers, coauthorship conventions, field-specific OA megajournals, and other “gold” OA psychology journal options, the challenges of interdisciplinarity, and how authors are availing themselves of green and gold OA strategies or using scholarly networking sites such as ResearchGate. Included are discussions of open science strategies in Psychology such as reproducibility, replication, and research data management. This overview will allow psychology researchers to get up to speed on these expansive topics. Further study into researcher behavior in terms of scholarly communication in Psychology would create more understanding of existing culture as well as provide researchers with a more effective roadmap to the current landscape. As no other single work is known to provide a current look at scholarly communication topics that is specifically focused on Psychology, this targeted overview aims to partially fill that niche.

show abstract

Open Practices Badges for Curricula Vitae: An additional way to help change incentives in Psychological Science?

Cited by 3 publications

References 17 publications

Navigating Open Science as Early Career Feminist Researchers

Navigating Open Science as Early Career Feminist Researchers

Navigating Open Science as Early Career Feminist Researchers

Open Access, Scholarly Communication, and Open Science in Psychology: An Overview for Researchers

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About