2022
DOI: 10.1007/s00590-022-03389-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Open reduction and internal fixation of Ideberg type IA glenoid fractures: Tricks, pearls, and potential pitfalls based on a retrospective cohort of 33 patients focusing on the rehabilitation protocol

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They found no consensus on the rehabilitation of these injuries as well as lack of uniformity in terms of the period of immobilization after surgery (67.2% of surgeons keep a sling for 3 to 6 weeks) and the return to sports activity. In a recent publication, Giordano et al 35 introduced an accelerated postoperative rehabilitation protocol for anterior rim glenoid fractures treated with ORIF. Rehabilitation began on the first postoperative day, including passive external rotation exercises and active-assisted flexion, adduction, and abduction exercises as tolerated.…”
Section: Brazilmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They found no consensus on the rehabilitation of these injuries as well as lack of uniformity in terms of the period of immobilization after surgery (67.2% of surgeons keep a sling for 3 to 6 weeks) and the return to sports activity. In a recent publication, Giordano et al 35 introduced an accelerated postoperative rehabilitation protocol for anterior rim glenoid fractures treated with ORIF. Rehabilitation began on the first postoperative day, including passive external rotation exercises and active-assisted flexion, adduction, and abduction exercises as tolerated.…”
Section: Brazilmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the open approaches require extensive soft-tissue dissection and pose the risk of neurovascular structures' injury. Besides, a single approach could not always allow sufficient and wide exposure of the entire glenoid cavity and may be correlated with poor visualization and inadequate fracture reduction [23][24][25][26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%