Open science in second language acquisition research: The IRIS repository of research materials and data

Marsden, Emma; Thompson, Sophie; Plonsky, Luke

doi:10.1051/shsconf/20173800013

Cited by 14 publications

(16 citation statements)

References 9 publications

(4 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Take the prompt cards in Roleplay (2), or RP 2, as an example (in Figure 1). The prompt cards of RPs 1 and 3 are available on the website of the IRIS Repository (Marsden et al, 2016).…”

Section: Study Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The 18 roleplay video clips were randomized and rated by all five raters. The rating workshop included five tasks: familiarizing raters with (1) the targeted goals, organization, and interactional patterns in the six phases of doctor–patient consultations with excerpts from the authentic data; (2) the rating criteria of the roleplays; (3) the rating scale of 0 (did not use any interactional patterns in the phase) to 3 (use the patterns effectively in the phase); (4) practicing rating one complete roleplay, and discussing issues and concerns they had while rating; (5) modifying the rating rubrics based on the discussion and the rating criteria, scale, and form are available on the IRIS website (Marsden et al, 2016).…”

Section: Study Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Using authentic doctor–patient consultations in improving communication skills

Yang

Hsu

2023

Foreign Language Annals

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Take the prompt cards in Roleplay (2), or RP 2, as an example (in Figure 1). The prompt cards of RPs 1 and 3 are available on the website of the IRIS Repository (Marsden et al, 2016).…”

Section: Study Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Study Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Using authentic doctor–patient consultations in improving communication skills

Yang

Hsu

2023

Foreign Language Annals

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Perhaps the clearest indicator of the need to embrace open science is the status of reproducibility (or lack thereof) across different disciplines (see, e.g., Sönning & Werner, 2021, specific for linguistics). Reproducibility issues can be mitigated through open science practices such as preregistration, complete and transparent reporting, and sharing of instruments, data and code such as on the IRIS repository (www.iris-database.org; Marsden et al, 2016). There are different facets of reproducibility and corresponding terms (e.g., Freese & Peterson, 2017;Nosek & Errington, 2020).…”

Section: Reproducibility: Verifying Research Openlymentioning

confidence: 99%

Open Science in Applied Linguistics: An Introduction to Metascience

Al‐Hoorie¹,

Hiver²

2023

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this chapter, we provide an overview of various topics related to open science, drawing often (and necessarily) on work outside of applied linguistics. Here, we define open science more broadly. Rather than limiting open science to the question of whether a study and its data are open access or behind a paywall, this chapter defines open science more generally as transparency in all aspects of the research process (see also Gass et al., 2021). From this perspective, the most relevant discipline dealing with these issues is metascience (or meta-research).

show abstract

“…The participants completed the word-monitoring task in the 3T-MRI scanner, while the other tasks were administered outside the scanner in a quiet room. All materials are available in the IRIS Digital Repository (Marsden et al, 2016).…”

Section: Instrumentsmentioning

confidence: 99%

An fMRI validation study of the word-monitoring task as a measure of implicit knowledge: Exploring the role of explicit and implicit aptitudes in behavioral and neural processing

Suzuki

Jeong

Cui

et al. 2022

Stud Second Lang Acquis

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this study, neural representation of adult second language (L2) speakers’ implicit grammatical knowledge was investigated. Advanced L2 speakers of Japanese living in Japan, as well as L1 Japanese speakers, performed a word-monitoring task (proposed as an implicit knowledge test) in the MRI scanner. Behavioral measures were obtained from aptitude tests for explicit (language analytic ability) and implicit (statistical learning ability) learning. Findings indicate that, although both L1 and L2 speakers recruited neural circuits associated with procedural memory during the word-monitoring task, different brain regions were activated: premotor cortex (L1 speakers) and left caudate (L2 speakers). The premotor cortex activation was weaker in L2 than L1 speakers but was positively correlated with the left caudate activation, suggesting that their grammatical knowledge, while less automatized, was still developing. Behavioral sensitivity to errors was predicted only by explicit language aptitude, which may play a key role in the automatization of grammatical knowledge.

show abstract

Open science in second language acquisition research: The IRIS repository of research materials and data

Cited by 14 publications

References 9 publications

Using authentic doctor–patient consultations in improving communication skills

Using authentic doctor–patient consultations in improving communication skills

Open Science in Applied Linguistics: An Introduction to Metascience

An fMRI validation study of the word-monitoring task as a measure of implicit knowledge: Exploring the role of explicit and implicit aptitudes in behavioral and neural processing

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About