DOI: 10.1039/9781849732802-00046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Open-shell organometallics: reactivity at the ligand

Abstract: The purpose of this review is to show that (cooperative) ligand radical reactivity can be effectively employed in synthetic organometallic chemistry and catalysis to achieve selectivity in radical-type transformations. The 'redox non-innocence' of ligands, and the controlled reactivity of 'ligand radicals' -giving rise to new, intriguing substrate transformations -allow unusual and selective radical-type substrate coupling reactions, ligand rearrangements and C-Y bond formations. In this review, several exampl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Carbon–carbon bond formation is often a consequence of redox noninnocence (RNI) that induces radical character in certain ligands. In many cases, a relatively simple coupling of carbon radicals occurs to form a single new bond, but sometimes the reactivity can be complicated. Figure illustrates some unusual C–C bond forming events discovered in these laboratories. In A , the Ti­(III) complex, (smif)­{Li­(smif–smif)}­Ti, was shown to contain one C–C bond derived from coupling of smif (smif = 1,3-di­(2-pyridyl)-2-azaallyl) ligands that were reduced during the course of its synthesis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Carbon–carbon bond formation is often a consequence of redox noninnocence (RNI) that induces radical character in certain ligands. In many cases, a relatively simple coupling of carbon radicals occurs to form a single new bond, but sometimes the reactivity can be complicated. Figure illustrates some unusual C–C bond forming events discovered in these laboratories. In A , the Ti­(III) complex, (smif)­{Li­(smif–smif)}­Ti, was shown to contain one C–C bond derived from coupling of smif (smif = 1,3-di­(2-pyridyl)-2-azaallyl) ligands that were reduced during the course of its synthesis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The formation of a cyclopropanated backbone of (dadi) n suggested that reversible C–C bond formation could be a means of storing and releasing electrons in a redox noninnocent (RNI) fashion. , A possible hindrance to RNI is the transfer of a cyclopropane hydrogen subsequent to ring-opening, which would generate a nacnac fragment in place of the original diimine. The reactivity of {PhC 3 H 3 (-NC 6 H 4 -2-NAr) 2 }­Ti­(THF) ( 3 ) was probed via various potential oxidants and proton acceptors, and while most generated mixtures, the addition of Ph 2 CN 2 yielded a single product (>90%) that was dissymmetric.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…Attempts to generate (dadi)­TiCRR′ have failed, and according to calculations, the generation of a stable alkylidene may not be possible since the RR′C: fragment is not oxidizing enough to pull electrons from (dadi) 4– . As indicated in Figure ., calculations on a benzylidene portray it as a diradical species , best considered (dadi· ↑ ) 3– Ti IV (C· ↓ (H)­Ph) ( 2 -C·HPh). Figure illustrates the calculated geometries of 2 -C·HPh which show the d (CN im ) to be 1.33 Å, and d (CC) = 1.39 Å, values that are between those found for dianionic ( n = −2) and tetraanionic ( n = −4) forms of (dadi) n .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Monomeric Rh II and Ir II species are typically supported by multidentate ligands with heteroatom coordination . For example, nitrogen donor ligands such as tetramesitylporphyrin (Chart C) , and bis­(oxazolines) support square-planar Rh II .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…13 Monomeric Rh II and Ir II species are typically supported by multidentate ligands with heteroatom coordination. 14 For example, nitrogen donor ligands such as tetramesitylporphyrin (Chart 1C) 10,11 and bis(oxazolines) support square-planar Rh II . 15 Pincer ligands also stabilize divalent, square-planar rhodium and iridium as in [(PNP)Rh II X] 16 (PNP = (4-Me-2-(iPr 2 P)-C 6 H 3 ) 2 N; X = Cl, OR) and [(PNP)Ir II X] (PNP = (tBu 2 PCHCH) 2 N; X = Cl, N 3 ).…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%