2020
DOI: 10.20944/preprints202004.0472.v1
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Open Source Digitally Replicable Lab-Grade Scales

Abstract: This study provides designs for a low-cost, easily replicable open source lab-grade digital scale that can be used as a precision balance. The design is such that it can be manufactured for use in most labs throughout the world with open source RepRap-class material extrusion-based 3-D printers for the mechanical components and readily available open source electronics including the Arduino Nano. Several versions of the design were fabricated and tested for precision and accuracy for a range of load cells. The… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, the printing of expensive optical-mechanical components, which is used in many metrological fields, is shown in Salazar-Serrano et al (2017), while a design framework to improve the design of these components is introduced by Delmans and Haseloff (2018). Indeed, it seems that all fields of metrology and scientific experimentation are embracing AM in some way, for example, open-source microscopes and accessories (del Rosario et al, 2021;Tadrous, 2021), an interferometric small angular measurement device (Hussain and Nath, 2018), motion stages such as scissor jacks and translation stages (Mills, 2021;Zhou et al, 2019) (which are used extensively in metrology), chemical separators (Davis et al, 2021), integrating spheres (da Cruz Junior andBachmann, 2021), an open-source lab-grade digital scale (Hubbard and Pearce, 2020), a polarimeter (Harvie and Mello, 2021), a modification to a shaker used in accelerometer calibration (Veldman, 2021), low-cost ultrasonic wave propagation wedges (Balvantin et al, 2020) and indeed, in many other works, as reviewed in Pearce (2020).…”
Section: Current Situation and Research Questionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the printing of expensive optical-mechanical components, which is used in many metrological fields, is shown in Salazar-Serrano et al (2017), while a design framework to improve the design of these components is introduced by Delmans and Haseloff (2018). Indeed, it seems that all fields of metrology and scientific experimentation are embracing AM in some way, for example, open-source microscopes and accessories (del Rosario et al, 2021;Tadrous, 2021), an interferometric small angular measurement device (Hussain and Nath, 2018), motion stages such as scissor jacks and translation stages (Mills, 2021;Zhou et al, 2019) (which are used extensively in metrology), chemical separators (Davis et al, 2021), integrating spheres (da Cruz Junior andBachmann, 2021), an open-source lab-grade digital scale (Hubbard and Pearce, 2020), a polarimeter (Harvie and Mello, 2021), a modification to a shaker used in accelerometer calibration (Veldman, 2021), low-cost ultrasonic wave propagation wedges (Balvantin et al, 2020) and indeed, in many other works, as reviewed in Pearce (2020).…”
Section: Current Situation and Research Questionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first test was with synthetic nasal mucous (Kryolan, Cotati, CA) [68]. The dry swab was weighed on a calibrated open source digital scale [63]. Then, the swab was placed vertically in synthetic nasal mucous and massed again.…”
Section: Absorption Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tip abrasion tests were performed by 1) massing the dry weight of the swab on the open source digital scale [63], 2) placing distal end of swab (absorbent end) next to human tissue (inner left arm) and applying a rotation to proximal end (hand side -handle) at hand twirling speed for 10 seconds, and 3) the swab was removed wash and dried, and 4) massed. The difference in the pre and post abrasion test was recorded.…”
Section: Abrasion Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation