2016
DOI: 10.4018/ijossp.2016010101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Open Source Software Evolution

Abstract: Due to the dominance of Open Source Software (OSS) in IT and the IT enabled services industry, various stakeholders are keen to understand the OSS evolution process. Several studies have been conducted in the past in this regard. There are various techniques used in the past for understanding OSS evolution process from different perspectives. This paper reports a systematic literature review on the topic in order to understand its current state and to identify opportunities for future. This research identified… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 108 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This paper is in continuation of a preceding one (Chahal and Saini, 2016) in which details of the review methodology for the systematic literature review are discussed. The preceding paper presents the review results related to OSS evolution analysis only (the first research question).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This paper is in continuation of a preceding one (Chahal and Saini, 2016) in which details of the review methodology for the systematic literature review are discussed. The preceding paper presents the review results related to OSS evolution analysis only (the first research question).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Next section describes the details of the studies answering the research questions numbered from two to nine (refer step 1 of the review process). A preceding paper (Chahal and Saini, 2016) presents the studies related to the research question numbered one.…”
Section: The Review Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation