2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2020.07.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Open transumbilical intussusception reduction in children: A prospective study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[ 1 ] In China, according to some scholars reported, the cost of curing intussusception was about 1213.50–1857.61 US dollars. [ 2 ] Color Doppler ultrasound is the primary choice for diagnosing intussusception. The success rate of air enema or water enema under color Doppler ultrasound monitoring to reset intussusception is over 90%, but some children are at risk of recurrence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 1 ] In China, according to some scholars reported, the cost of curing intussusception was about 1213.50–1857.61 US dollars. [ 2 ] Color Doppler ultrasound is the primary choice for diagnosing intussusception. The success rate of air enema or water enema under color Doppler ultrasound monitoring to reset intussusception is over 90%, but some children are at risk of recurrence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An underlying pathological lead point should often be investigated in SBIs While laparotomy was the previously preferred surgical treatment for SBI, in recent years, laparoscopy has been used for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes 19,20 . Apelt et al 21 reviewed the literature on 276 patients in their assessment of the efficiency of laparoscopy in pediatric intussusception and reported successful treatment of 196 (71%) patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eight studies reported operative time and seven studies were suitable for meta-analysis. [4][5][6][7][8][9][10] Meta-analysis demonstrated no statistically significant difference between the two groups with obvious statistical heterogeneity (I 2 ¼ 79%, WMD ¼ 6.13, 95% CI: À 7.74 to 20.0; p ¼ 0.39; ►Fig. 3).…”
Section: Operative Timementioning
confidence: 94%
“…Ten studies reported operative age while only six studies were suitable for meta-analysis. [4][5][6][7][8][9] Meta-analysis demonstrated no statistically significant difference between the two groups (weighted mean difference [WMD] ¼ 0.43, 95% confidence interval [CI]: À 1.83 to 2.69; p ¼ 0.71; ►Fig. 2).…”
Section: Operative Agementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation