Open versus laparoscopic versus robotic gastrectomy for cancer: need for comparative-effectiveness quality

Glantzounis, George; Ziogas, Dimosthenis; Baltogiannis, Georgios

doi:10.1007/s00464-009-0790-y

Cited by 4 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 34 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The two largest studies were by Song et al [ 9 ] in 2009 in which they summarized their initial 100 cases of robot-assisted gastrectomy with lymph node dissection followed by another one [ 17 ] in 2011 with 61 patients. In general, these case series supported the safety and Again, these studies concluded that D2 lymph node dissection is technically feasible [ 31 ] and had the benefi t of less operative blood loss and shorter postoperative hospital stay than laparoscopic and open gastrectomy groups [ 32 ]. Most common robotic disadvantages were found to be longer operative time, higher costs, loss of tactile sensation, and the lack of oncologic results and long-term outcomes.…”

Section: Outcomes Reviewmentioning

confidence: 76%

Gastric Cancer: Partial, Subtotal, and Total Gastrectomies/Lymph Node Dissection for Gastric Malignancies

Hyung

Woo

2013

Robotics in General Surgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Outcomes Reviewmentioning

confidence: 76%

Gastric Cancer: Partial, Subtotal, and Total Gastrectomies/Lymph Node Dissection for Gastric Malignancies

Hyung

Woo

2013

Robotics in General Surgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…In general, they all share the concept that RG with D2 lymph-node dissection is safe, technically feasible for experienced laparoscopic surgeons. On the one hand it's oncologically effective compared to open surgery,(32) associated with less operative blood loss and shorter post-operative hospital stay than laparoscopic and open gastrectomy(33); on the other hand there are still some unresolved issues related to this new technology(5): longer operation time, loss of tactile sensation, higher costs, indications, oncologic equivalency to its counterparts.…”

Section: Current Statusmentioning

confidence: 99%

Robotic Gastrectomy: The Current State of the Art

Marano

Hyung

2012

J Gastric Cancer

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Since the first laparoscopic gastrectomy for cancer was reported in 1994, minimally invasive surgery is enjoying its wide acceptance. Numerous procedures of this approach have developed, and many patients have benefited from its effectiveness, which has been recently demonstrated for early gastric cancer. However, since laparoscopic surgery is not exempt from some limitations, the robotic surgery system was introduced as a solution by the late 1990's. Many experienced surgeons have embraced this new emerging method that provides undoubted technical and minimally invasive advantages. To date, several studies have concentrated to this new system, and have compared it with open and laparoscopic approach. Most of them have reported satisfactory results concerning the post-operative short-term outcomes, but almost all believe that the role of robotic gastrectomy is still out of focus, especially because long-term outcomes that can prove robotic oncologic equivalency are lacking, and operative costs and time are higher in comparison to the open and laparoscopic ones. This article is a review about the current status of robotic surgery for the treatment of gastric cancer, especially, focusing on the technical aspects, comparisons to other approaches and future prospects.

show abstract

Lower rate of conversion using robotic-assisted surgery compared to laparoscopy in completion total gastrectomy for remnant gastric cancer

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Open versus laparoscopic versus robotic gastrectomy for cancer: need for comparative-effectiveness quality

Cited by 4 publications

References 34 publications

Gastric Cancer: Partial, Subtotal, and Total Gastrectomies/Lymph Node Dissection for Gastric Malignancies

Gastric Cancer: Partial, Subtotal, and Total Gastrectomies/Lymph Node Dissection for Gastric Malignancies

Robotic Gastrectomy: The Current State of the Art

Lower rate of conversion using robotic-assisted surgery compared to laparoscopy in completion total gastrectomy for remnant gastric cancer

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About