2003
DOI: 10.1007/s10350-004-6555-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Open vs. Laparoscopic Surgery for Rectal Prolapse

Abstract: Laparoscopic repair for rectal prolapse is technically feasible and can be performed with mortality and morbidity rates comparable to those of the conventional technique. The main advantages of the laparoscopic approach appear to be a shorter hospital stay and lessened intraoperative blood loss. Recurrence rate is not increased in the short term.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

4
17
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
4
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies report that the operative time for laparoscopic rectopexy is longer than that for open abdominal procedures [13][14][15]. In our study, the median operative time was 135 min, which is similar to the published duration for open surgery [13,16].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Previous studies report that the operative time for laparoscopic rectopexy is longer than that for open abdominal procedures [13][14][15]. In our study, the median operative time was 135 min, which is similar to the published duration for open surgery [13,16].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Both higher and lower morbidity rates have been reported [5,14,15]. There may be no difference in morbidity between the laparoscopic and open procedures [2].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In adults, laparoscopic rectopexy has gained wide popularity because of its minor invasiveness and good cosmesis [8,10]. Equally good results have been achieved by laparoscopic and open procedures [8,10]. We present a series of eight patients with PRP who underwent laparoscopic rectopexy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…For children with persistent rectal prolapse (PRP), a variety of surgical procedures have been described, including sacral rectopexy through posterosagittal incision [2], transabdominal sacral rectopexy with or without sigmoid resection [2,7], rectal submucosal sclerosant injections [6], Thiersch cerclage [1], and EkehornÕs rectosacropexy [11]. In adults, laparoscopic rectopexy has gained wide popularity because of its minor invasiveness and good cosmesis [8,10]. Equally good results have been achieved by laparoscopic and open procedures [8,10].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%