2014 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC) 2014
DOI: 10.1109/icc.2014.6883781
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

OpenFlow driven ethernet traffic analysis

Abstract: Software Defined Networking (SDN) is a new networking paradigm that permits to slice network infrastructures. An example of SDN is the OpenFlow framework, where the control plane runs on a separate device, called controller, that manages data forwarding switches. The OpenFlow protocol ensures communications between OpenFlow switches and the OpenFlow controller. Before widely deploying OpenFlow based networks, scalability and performance of such networks should be studied and better understood.In this paper, th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to evenly balance the flows according to traffic patterns and link utiliza-tion, it is essential for a load balancing approach to obtain global network information. Combining with the centralized network architecture such as SDN [26], some mechanisms can use controller to collect global network information and assign flows to proper paths through the Openflow protocols [27]. However, these solutions lack scalability because the overhead of collecting information, computing paths and deploying paths makes them impractical to respond timely in large-scale networks.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to evenly balance the flows according to traffic patterns and link utiliza-tion, it is essential for a load balancing approach to obtain global network information. Combining with the centralized network architecture such as SDN [26], some mechanisms can use controller to collect global network information and assign flows to proper paths through the Openflow protocols [27]. However, these solutions lack scalability because the overhead of collecting information, computing paths and deploying paths makes them impractical to respond timely in large-scale networks.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All the management and control functions (routing, flow identification, QoS, etc.) are taken over by the OpenFlow controller, which has a global view of the network and configures the switches to forward packets on the basis of a specified flow definition [20,21]. With OpenFlow, load-balancing scheduling techniques are programmable and have received considerable attention.…”
Section: Software-defined Networking Schemesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These values permit to properly plan the control network (for a given flow arrival rate) and to quantitatively evaluate the conditions under which the traffic overhead due to SDN can be considered negligible with respect to the data carried by the flow. If we consider an average flow size of 10-20 kB for the data as reported in [23,24], the overall control bandwidth is surprisingly large relatively to the amount of exchanged data and is mainly due to the reactive nature of the two applications. These results suggest that reactive applications in large POP networks should be avoided and provide an upper bound on the maximum amount of control traffic that any real application (which is supposed to act in a hybrid way between reactive and proactive behaviors) would generate.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Openflow Control Trafficmentioning
confidence: 99%