2021
DOI: 10.1002/psp4.12615
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Opening a debate on open‐source modeling tools: Pouring fuel on fire versus extinguishing the flare of a healthy debate

Abstract: This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As MIDD enters mainstream use during drug development by many pharmaceutical companies, community assessment of various models applied to a certain problem and settling on some selected models that can be used repeatedly by a mass of users with assurance on reproducibly of results become inevitable. This is distinct from the somewhat academic research-oriented use (78).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As MIDD enters mainstream use during drug development by many pharmaceutical companies, community assessment of various models applied to a certain problem and settling on some selected models that can be used repeatedly by a mass of users with assurance on reproducibly of results become inevitable. This is distinct from the somewhat academic research-oriented use (78).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…There are plenty of evidence to suggest this has become an integral part of modern drug development by leading pharmaceutical companies (72,73) and all the signs are in place from the top regulatory agencies that MIDD is seen not only acceptable approach in many cases but also an encouraged path in certain circumstances (74)(75)(76)(77). Therefore, the pharmaceutical industry is arriving at a conjuncture where ability to incorporate the MIDD paradigm into widespread practice is not just an internal scientific decision; it is rather a management strategy issue (78). As with many other management tasks this requires careful assessment of implementation (if MIDD nucleus is not in place) and scaling regarding many other elements (personnel, tools, environment and processes).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the drug development applications, all of them used commercial packages that offer more comprehensive verification of the models as demanded by regulators. 27 Although commercial software was also dominant for the clinical and model development application, there was more use of general modeling tools such as MATLAB. This is probably because of the fact that the user has more control over the model code.…”
Section: Conclusion/discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of such methods may in fact lead to results that are uninterpretable, or, even worse, open to misinterpretation by non-expert GSA users. Certain applications of PBPK M&S require reliable, robust, well-characterised and tested models [ 45 ]. We believe that these requirements should apply for GSA methods and algorithms as well.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%