Openness and Urban Governance: How Transparency Erodes Local Government

Abstract

Local government political leaders have a hard job these days. More and more they are confronted by citizens demanding transparency and a say in the production of social goods. Challenging the hegemony of local government, they connect their resources to come up with grass roots solutions. Fear of litigation claims and an increase in the complexity of policymaking and administration and fiscal scarcity render local administrations risk averse.How to effectively structure the frontline between local government and local communities? Open and collaborative governance approaches hold the promise of developing to mediate these tensions, but what are the implications for the way local democracy, local government and local administration work? This article looks at the ugly face of trust in collaborative and open governance on the basis of a comparative casestudy from Apeldoorn (The Netherlands). The article identifies and analyses patterns of (a lack of) open governance and offers alternative models to the organization of the frontline between local government and society.

Local Government Response to COVID-19: Revitalizing Local Democracy in Bangladesh

“…However, recent local government acts and partisan elections at the local level helps to reduce those challenges as they broaden the scope for both the political party and mass people to control the local bodies legally. The primary interest of the ruling party's decentralization is to strengthen their power at the grass-root level and support political education for effective democracy [29][30][31][32]. As a result, it is becoming fertile land for leadership development training [24], while the leaders are the driver of alteration in local governance [33].…”

Discussing the determinants of online budget transparency based on a spatial regression analysis of Croatian cities and municipalities: Do good neighbours make you better?

“…Because politicians can be sanctioned if they disrespect such social values, they resort to the voluntary revelation of information to ensure their political survival, thus promoting their legitimacy (Deegan, 2002; Patten, 1992). Jorna (2015) stressed that applying transparency to budget procedures and public procurement can ensure public participation to improve the legitimacy and effectiveness of municipalities. Moreover, municipalities using new technologies can gain greater legitimacy because online distribution channels can reach and influence a large number of citizens (García-Tabuyo et al, 2016).…”