2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2023.01.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Operando spectroscopies capturing surface reconstruction and interfacial electronic regulation by FeOOH@Fe2O3@Ni(OH)2 heterostructures for robust oxygen evolution reaction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the comparison of Tafel slope values, it can be concluded that the γ-FeOOH@ Ni(OH) 2 /NF sample has the best performance in terms of the OER, with fast reaction kinetics and low driving overpotentials, and therefore has better catalytic activity. More importantly, the OER catalytic activity of γ-FeOOH@Ni(OH) 2 /NF was also superior to many previously reported nickel-or iron-based nonprecious metal catalysts (Figure 5e and Table S2), for example, at a current density of 100 mA cm −2 for FeOOH/ Co(OH) 2 (265 mV, 38 mV dec −1 ), 25 γ-FeOOH/NF-6 M (316 mV, 51 mV dec −1 ), 22 Co-FeOOH (297 mV, 36 mV dec −1 ), 50 Fe−Mn−O NS/CC (397 mV, 63.9 mV dec −1 ), 51 FeOOH@ Fe 2 O 3 @Ni(OH) 2 (269 mV, 60.2 mV dec −1 ), 52 (Ni 0.7 Fe 0.3 )-C 2 O 4 /NF (243 mV, 43 mV dec −1 ), 53 and so on. To fully evaluate the durability of the γ-FeOOH@Ni(OH)-2/NF catalysts, we designed and implemented a series of experiments.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the comparison of Tafel slope values, it can be concluded that the γ-FeOOH@ Ni(OH) 2 /NF sample has the best performance in terms of the OER, with fast reaction kinetics and low driving overpotentials, and therefore has better catalytic activity. More importantly, the OER catalytic activity of γ-FeOOH@Ni(OH) 2 /NF was also superior to many previously reported nickel-or iron-based nonprecious metal catalysts (Figure 5e and Table S2), for example, at a current density of 100 mA cm −2 for FeOOH/ Co(OH) 2 (265 mV, 38 mV dec −1 ), 25 γ-FeOOH/NF-6 M (316 mV, 51 mV dec −1 ), 22 Co-FeOOH (297 mV, 36 mV dec −1 ), 50 Fe−Mn−O NS/CC (397 mV, 63.9 mV dec −1 ), 51 FeOOH@ Fe 2 O 3 @Ni(OH) 2 (269 mV, 60.2 mV dec −1 ), 52 (Ni 0.7 Fe 0.3 )-C 2 O 4 /NF (243 mV, 43 mV dec −1 ), 53 and so on. To fully evaluate the durability of the γ-FeOOH@Ni(OH)-2/NF catalysts, we designed and implemented a series of experiments.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Raman spectrum of ErFeO post-OER (Figure S15b) was similar to that obtained before the OER test, except for a broad peak observed in the range of 510−900 cm −1 . The multiple vibration modes of the new phase of FeOOH at around 540 and 660 cm −1 , 58 along with those of Er 2 O 3 and Fe 2 O 3 , may result in a broad peak in this range. The XRD pattern in Figure S15c of ErFeO after the 30 h long-term durability test showed consistent peaks with those observed before the OER, albeit with slight intensity variations.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[7][8] The basic reactions are the same, even if these devices are constructed differently. [9] The hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) at the cathode electrode and the oxygen evolution reaction (OER) at the anode is involved in a water-splitting device, [10][11][12][13][14] while metal dissolution and deposition take place at the negative (metal) electrode and the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) and OER at the positive electrodes are involved in a rechargeable metal-air battery. [15] Since OER is the most efficient of the two technologies and involves the formation of oxygenoxygen bonds and four proton-coupled electron transfer processes, it is kinetically slow compared to the other halfreactions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%