2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.cep.2015.11.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Operating parameters and costs assessments of a real dyehouse wastewater effluent treated by a continuous electrocoagulation process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
37
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 167 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
3
37
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, at I = 4, 6, 8, and 10 A, the pH was 4.8, 2.3, 2.2, and 1, respectively. Gu et al suggest that (4) and (5) for the oxidation of water will decrease solution pH [30] and this was observed in this work, so, the super-faradaic efficiencies are greater for aluminum than those for iron [29].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, at I = 4, 6, 8, and 10 A, the pH was 4.8, 2.3, 2.2, and 1, respectively. Gu et al suggest that (4) and (5) for the oxidation of water will decrease solution pH [30] and this was observed in this work, so, the super-faradaic efficiencies are greater for aluminum than those for iron [29].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 68%
“…The problem of industrial wastewater is a topic that deserves special attention, particularly for industries that use dyes and thus generate large volumes of polluted wastewater. Due to their high molecular weights, complex structures, and especially high solubility in water, dyes persist once discharged into a natural environment, for example, textile [1,2], pharmaceutical [3], cosmetics and food industry [4], and industrial wastewater [5]. Specifically for the textile industry, the chemical structure of these compounds is complex, generally of the type azo [6][7][8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to [68], they mentioned that the total cost estimation typically includes the chemical reagents, cost of electricity, sludge handlings, operators, and maintenance and equipment used in the EC system. However, in laboratory research, the electrode, consumption of electrical energy, and chemicals are the main parameters of the operating expenditure [69,70]. Also, the consumption of zeolite is also revealed in this analysis using Equation (4) as follows:…”
Section: The Economic Aspect Of the Zaep Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…3 (b) shows that at 10 min of operating time the removal efficiency increased from 63 to 88% for COD and from 75 to 90% for P. From these results, it can be concluded that the use of iron scrap as anode can enhance the removal of P and COD from urban wastewater and the required current for achieving the maximum COD and P removals was 2 A. It was also reported that the increase in current led to increase the amount of iron hydroxide available in solution and 35 the coagulant production rate, which improves the removal efficiency. Moreover, the bubbles generation rate increased with increasing the current that contributes to the improvement of pollutant removal from 17 wastewater by electroflotation process.…”
Section: Effect Of Currentmentioning
confidence: 77%