2014
DOI: 10.1111/ajfs.12066
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Operating Performance Following Acquisitions: Evidence from Taiwan's IT Industry

Abstract: This paper examines the performance of Taiwanese firms following acquisitions and finds that, when contrasted with the acquisitions that take place in the U.S., Taiwanese acquirers exhibit negative industry-adjusted accounting performance. The negative performance is mostly driven by firms with low growth opportunities, but is mitigated under more concentrated shareholdings and better board structures. These findings suggest that while weak corporate governance at the country-level may adversely affect the ove… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
(92 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In considering context and process , research can disentangle different dimensions of family involvement, such as family ownership, management or governance (e.g., Huang et al, 2014), and unpack how they affect business restructuring decisions and implementation. Specifically, privately‐held, family firms may not be able to benefit much from business restructuring research that is focused on public firms, as the associated implications may not be comparable to their circumstances (e.g., Beehr, et al, 1997; Chrisman et al, 2004; Zahra et al, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In considering context and process , research can disentangle different dimensions of family involvement, such as family ownership, management or governance (e.g., Huang et al, 2014), and unpack how they affect business restructuring decisions and implementation. Specifically, privately‐held, family firms may not be able to benefit much from business restructuring research that is focused on public firms, as the associated implications may not be comparable to their circumstances (e.g., Beehr, et al, 1997; Chrisman et al, 2004; Zahra et al, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, others find that family businesses destroy value when acquiring another firm (Bauguess and Stegemoller, 2008; Gleason et al , 2014; Leepsa and Mishra, 2013), benefit less from acquisitions (Shim and Okamuro, 2011), and that family control has a negative effect on the market value, in comparison with the case of non-family firms (Wong et al , 2010). Huang et al (2014) find that, especially in firms with low growth prospects, family ownership weakens the post-deal operating performance. Two studies, however, find that family ownership has no effect on M&A performance (Miller et al , 2010; Caprio et al , 2011).…”
Section: Thematic Categoriesmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Distinguishing among the sample countries is important in M&A research, because the legal environments and corporate governance vary greatly from area to area. It is rather surprising that only nine studies (Achleitner et al , 2010; André et al , 2014; Bae et al , 2002; Ben-Amar and André, 2006; Craninckx and Huyghebaert, 2015; Feito-Ruiz and Menéndez-Requejo, 2010; Franks et al , 2012; Huang et al , 2014; Song and Rath, 2010) consider the influence of the legal environment and the national corporate governance system, despite it having an influence on performance. The characterization of weaker and stronger shareholder protection systems is traditionally based on the divergence between common law and civil law systems.…”
Section: Descriptive Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There is a variation between developed and developing countries in terms of the implementation of corporate governance (Huang et al, 2014;Thanathawee, 2015). This is a result of a weakness of corporate governance practices in developing and emerging countries (Ertugrul, 2015;Anas, 2015).…”
Section: Factors Affecting Corporate Governance Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%