1992
DOI: 10.1209/0295-5075/18/8/004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Operation of a “Cold-Atom Laser” in a Magneto-Optical Trap

Abstract: We have observed a laser oscillation when a cloud of magneto-optically trapped cesium atoms is inserted in an optical cavity. The laser oscillation occurs at a frequency which is detuned from the trapping beam frequency by 150 kHz. The gain mechanism is due to stimulated Raman processes recently observed in such media.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
1
1

Year Published

1994
1994
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
31
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, such a system exhibits most of the features of the proposed superradiant laser, and can be used to test key predictions. While similar lasing has been observed before in a cold-atom system [8], Bohnet et al are the first to characterize the frequency stability of the laser, and to explicitly demonstrate that the laser frequency depends only very weakly on the resonator length. A notable feature of the superradiant laser is that the oscillation is stored predominantly in the atoms, rather than in the light field circulating inside the laser resonator.…”
mentioning
confidence: 52%
“…Nevertheless, such a system exhibits most of the features of the proposed superradiant laser, and can be used to test key predictions. While similar lasing has been observed before in a cold-atom system [8], Bohnet et al are the first to characterize the frequency stability of the laser, and to explicitly demonstrate that the laser frequency depends only very weakly on the resonator length. A notable feature of the superradiant laser is that the oscillation is stored predominantly in the atoms, rather than in the light field circulating inside the laser resonator.…”
mentioning
confidence: 52%
“…By pumping near resonance, Mollow gain [8,9] is the dominant process and gives rise to a laser oscillation, whose spectrum is large (of the order of the atomic natural linewidth), whereas by pumping further from resonance, Raman gain between Zeeman sublevels [10] gives rise to a weaker, spectrally sharper laser [11]. At last, by using two counterpropagating pump beams, degenerate four-wave mixing (FWM) [12,13] produces a laser with a power up to 300 W. By adjusting the atom-laser detuning or the pump geometry, we can continuously tune the laser from one regime to another.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…100,104 The output polarization is orthogonal to the pump one (contrary to the Mollow laser) and, in our experiment, 100 this gain produces a laser with less power (2 µW). Moreover, the sharpness of the gain curve makes the Raman gain very sensitive to any Doppler shift.…”
Section: Raman Gain Using Zeeman Sublevelsmentioning
confidence: 56%