1988
DOI: 10.1016/0149-1970(88)90065-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Operational and economical experience with vibration and loose parts monitoring systems on primary circuits of PWRS

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most of the world's PWRs are equipped with an LPMS (IAEA 2008, Olma 2003, Michel and Puyal 1988. In the United States, the NRC regulates LPMS design and use pursuant to Regulatory Guide 1.133, which states, "An inservice loose-part detection program should be implemented for the primary system of light-water cooled reactors during preoperational testing and the startup and power operation mode…."…”
Section: Figure Pagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the world's PWRs are equipped with an LPMS (IAEA 2008, Olma 2003, Michel and Puyal 1988. In the United States, the NRC regulates LPMS design and use pursuant to Regulatory Guide 1.133, which states, "An inservice loose-part detection program should be implemented for the primary system of light-water cooled reactors during preoperational testing and the startup and power operation mode…."…”
Section: Figure Pagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…German KTA [2] and European standard [3] also request the use of LPMS. Consequently, one can find LPMS on each French PWRs [4], on most of German PWRs [5], as well as on many other PWRs in Europe. The biggest problem of recent LPMS systems was the high missed alarm and false alarm rate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Developers tried to improve the situation, introducing different methods based on observations of the signatures of the signals measured in practice. In France, the crest factor is widely used [4], in some other countries different threshold levels for amplitudes and rms. values are combined.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%