2013
DOI: 10.1080/15472450.2012.707052
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Operational Assessment of Joint and Conventional Lane Merge Configurations for Freeway Work Zones

Abstract: Inefficient traffic operation at work-zone areas typically leads to increased travel time delays, queue length, fuel consumption, number of forced merges, and possibly roadway accidents. Using crash data collected from active work zones in Louisiana between 2003 and 2007, a safety analysis for the conventional lane merge configurations recommended in the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) revealed that the fatality, injury, and property damage crash rates in the advance warning area of work zone… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(22 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results showed that the new proposed configuration outperformed the conventional lane merge by a maximum of 12.6% improvement in throughput and 94.83% reduction in average delay time at high levels of demand. The results also indicated that the conventional lane merge configurations are more suitable for sites with relatively high percentage of trucks, while joint lane merge configurations are more suitable for sites with low percentage of trucks [4].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The results showed that the new proposed configuration outperformed the conventional lane merge by a maximum of 12.6% improvement in throughput and 94.83% reduction in average delay time at high levels of demand. The results also indicated that the conventional lane merge configurations are more suitable for sites with relatively high percentage of trucks, while joint lane merge configurations are more suitable for sites with low percentage of trucks [4].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…To date, the merging plan shown in Fig. 3 has been tested virtually, in the field during live construction, and in the field without construction (Aghazadeh and Ikuma, 2013; Rayaprolu et al, 2010;Costa, 2013;Idewu and Wolshon, 2010). Results were similar for each test.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Video observations of truck drivers showed that many of them merge early, regardless of the merging system used. Coupled with the finding that the average speed of trucks on interstates is four to seven miles per hour below that of passenger cars (Indrajit Chatterjee, 2009;Rayaprolu et al, 2013), the potential for trucks to drastically affect traffic flow at work zones is high.…”
Section: Percent Truck Compositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to road pavement reconstruction, pipeline installation, underground engineering construction, the work zones sometimes should be set at the intersections, which results in a decrease in lane number (Li, Mori, & Work, 2018;Liu, Khattak, & Zhang, 2016). The capacity of the intersection reduces accordingly, which may even affect the adjacent road network if it the critical intersection in the region (Al-Deek and Emam, 2006;Lukose, Levin, & Boyles, 2019;Rayaprolu, Ishak, Qi, & Wolshon, 2013;Xu et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%