Operational challenges and considerations for COVID-19 research in humanitarian settings: A qualitative study of a project in Eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo and South Sudan

Abstract

Since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, much research has been conducted globally, but relatively few studies have been carried out in complex emergency settings that pose numerous operational challenges. We conducted a qualitative study to explore the barriers and enablers of a COVID-19 cohort study conducted in South Sudan and Eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo, to inform future research on COVID-19 and infectious diseases in humanitarian settings. We used a case study design embedded within the original prospective cohort study. Qualitative data was collected through four health facility assessments, 28 key informant interviews, and a focus group discussion. Data were analyzed using a manual thematic analysis approach and summarized against four primary themes: testing challenges and enablers, perceptions and attitudes towards COVID-19, national health system considerations, and study management considerations. Findings suggest most of the challenges affecting the cohort study were not specific to COVID-19 research but have been a feature of previous infectious disease research carried out in complex emergencies. However, the pandemic has exacerbated certain problems. The high proportion of travellers enrolled due to testing mandates, stigmatization of infected individuals linked to the heavy global focus on COVID-19, strained resources during waves of increasing infections, and remote management requirements all negatively impacted the cohort study. Factors that facilitated the research included proactive management, data quality oversight procedures, and strong collaboration with national health stakeholders. The global impact of COVID-19, its high public profile, and specific pandemic policies pose further operational challenges for research in already complex humanitarian settings. Future studies could plan mitigation measures that include flexibility in staffing and budgets, strategies to expand testing, and early partnerships with local organizations and health authorities.

Clinical progression and outcomes of patients hospitalized with COVID-19 in humanitarian settings: A prospective cohort study in South Sudan and Eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo

“…This cohort study details clinical progression and outcomes of 144 hospitalized COVID-19 patients in North and South Kivu in eastern DRC and Juba, SSD. The observed hospital mortality proportion of 16.7% is comparable to findings from global systematic reviews of COVID-19 inpatient survival [16,17] but lower than prior studies in DRC which observed mortality rates of 22% and 32% and were conducted earlier in the pandemic in Kinshasa [18,19]. However, actual mortality in study facilities was higher due to the inability to enroll patients presenting near death; this figure was not tracked in SSD, however in DRC 24 patients died before being admitted to the study (2.3% of DRC study participants).…”

Integration of COVID-19 and TB screening in Kampala, Uganda: healthcare provider perspectives

“…A potential limitation of our study is that the findings from our study are from a single urban national referral hospital and some contextual factors may not be generalizable in different settings. However, many such centers in Uganda and other sub-Saharan African countries often have similar challenges [ 34 , 35 ].…”

On the optimal presence strategies for workplace during pandemics: A COVID-19 inspired probabilistic model

“…During the pandemics, particularly the very recent coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2, hereafter COVID-19) pandemic, most of the services provided by the companies, organizations and governments' facilities have been affected significantly in terms of quality and quantity [1][2][3][4][5][6]. On one hand, most of the employees have been at risk of infection and on the other hand, the work-flows and functions have become slow.…”