Operational concepts for limited delegation of separation assurance to the cockpit

Hoffman, Eric; Zeghal, Karim; Cloerec, Anne; Grimaud, Isabelle; Nicolaon, Jean-Pierre

doi:10.2514/6.1999-3990

Cited by 17 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Examples of these are infrastructure, airborne equipment, ATM equipment, new separation minima, procedures, and phraseology." Numerous international organizations are conducting such necessary research; see, e.g., [22][23][24]. This research is being brought to bear in developing standards through appropriate organizations and focus groups (See [25][26][27]), and operational evaluations [28,29].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Self-separation corridors

Mundra

Simons

2007

2007 IEEE/AIAA 26th Digital Avionics Systems Conference

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Self-separation corridors

Mundra

Simons

2007

2007 IEEE/AIAA 26th Digital Avionics Systems Conference

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Earlier in the course of this study [3], we have defined a form of delegation both for sequencing applications in terminal areas, and for crossing and passing applications in en-route. An experiment with human-in-the-loop has been carried out to evaluate the expected benefits.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Delegation of crossing operations to the flight crew - First quantitative results

Hoffman

Grimaud

Rognin

et al. 2001

AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference and Exhibit

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In the scope of assessing the impact of the delegation of crossing operations to the flight crew, an experiment with twelve controllers from different European countries has been carried out. The airspace simulated was a part of the Paris area, and consisted of two measured sectors with varied conflict situations. The controllers' feedback is positive: delegation would allow solutions to be selected sooner, would induce less time-critical instructions and therefore would provide them with a higher availability. However, controllers questioned the usability in heavy traffic conditions, e.g. with more complex situations. The quantitative objective measurements match the subjective feedback from the controllers in suggesting potential benefits from delegation in en-route. A reduction of the number of manoeuvring instructions has been measured. The analysis of the distribution of manoeuvring instructions shows that the instructions are given earlier. No significant impact in terms of flight efficiency was observed, although for the crossing point considered trajectories become straighter. At this point, no significant impact on safety was observed.

show abstract

Organizational Support for Safety Programs: Lessons from the Military and Airline Industry

Barter¹

2010

Nurse Leader

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Operational concepts for limited delegation of separation assurance to the cockpit

Cited by 17 publications

References 1 publication

Self-separation corridors

Self-separation corridors

Delegation of crossing operations to the flight crew - First quantitative results

Organizational Support for Safety Programs: Lessons from the Military and Airline Industry

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About