Operational Convective-Scale Numerical Weather Prediction with the COSMO Model: Description and Sensitivities

Abstract

Since April 2007, the numerical weather prediction model, COSMO (Consortium for Small Scale Modelling), has been used operationally in a convection-permitting configuration, named COSMO-DE, at the Deutscher Wetterdienst (DWD; German weather service). Here the authors discuss the model changes that were necessary for the convective scale, and report on the experience from the first years of operational application of the model. For COSMO-DE the ability of the numerical solver to treat small-scale structures has been improved by using a Runge–Kutta method, which allows for the use of higher-order upwind advection schemes. The one-moment cloud microphysics parameterization has been extended by a graupel class, and adaptations for describing evaporation of rain and stratiform precipitation processes were made. Comparisons with a much more sophisticated two-moment scheme showed only minor differences in most cases with the exception of strong squall-line situations. Whereas the deep convection parameterization was switched off completely, small-scale shallow convection was still parameterized by the appropriate part of the Tiedtke scheme. During the first year of operational use, convective events in synoptically driven situations were satisfactorily simulated. Also the daily cycles of summertime 10-m wind and 1-h precipitation sums were well captured. However, it became evident that the boundary layer description had to be adapted to enhance convection initiation in airmass convection situations. Here the asymptotic Blackadar length scale l∞ had proven to be a sensitive parameter.

Entrainment and detrainment in cumulus convection: an overview

“…Staniforth and Wood, 2008;Weisman, 2008;Baldauf et al, 2011;Seity et al, 2011). At these resolutions, cumulus convection is partly resolved but still needs partial parametrisations.…”

Diurnal equilibrium convection and land surface–atmosphere interactions in an idealized cloud‐resolving model

“…The CCLM is a versatile limited-area atmospheric modelling system including a whole suite of model parametrizations (Steppeler et al, 2003;Doms and Förstner, 2004;Baldauf et al, 2011). It is based on the non-hydrostatic compressible atmospheric equations, uses the split-explicit time-stepping scheme (Klemp and Wilhelmson, 1978;Wicker and Skamarock, 2002), and is suited to applications with horizontal grid spacings from about 100 m to 100 km.…”

Climate change in the next 30 years: What can a convection-permitting model tell us that we did not already know?

“…The limitations of convection parameterised RCMs in the representation of the diurnal cycle of precipitation and the atmospheric conditions leading to convection are well-known and documented (e.g. Brockhaus et al 2008;Baldauf et al 2011;Fosser et al 2015). Reaching convection-permitting resolutions allows not only to eliminate a major source of uncertainties and errors, but also to improve the representation of hourly precipitation intensity and spatial distribution (Prein et al 2013;Fosser et al 2015) as well as the representation of surface fluxes (Tölle et al 2014).…”